We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, the backrefmarkers are notated like so {{+~\1~+}} which roughly translates to
{{+~\1~+}}
it will be replaced with the nth to last previous placeholder value, surrounded by quotes.
n
I think named backrefmarkers would be much more readable and quicker to create snippets.
For example, given this snippet file:
So your name is {{+name+}}? How are you doing {{+name+}}?
In this case both instances of {{+name+}} should be replaced with the same value.
{{+name+}}
Given that this is syntax is already in use as placeholder text, perhaps this syntax could work instead;
{{+[name]+}}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently, the backrefmarkers are notated like so
{{+~\1~+}}
which roughly translates toI think named backrefmarkers would be much more readable and quicker to create snippets.
For example, given this snippet file:
In this case both instances of
{{+name+}}
should be replaced with the same value.Given that this is syntax is already in use as placeholder text, perhaps this syntax could work instead;
{{+[name]+}}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: