feat: Add aws_security_group_rule.cluster_https_worker_ingress to output values #901
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dpiddockcmp
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2020
4 tasks
barryib
pushed a commit
to Polyconseil/terraform-aws-eks
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2020
michaeljmarshall
deleted the
output-security-group-rule-for-explicit-dependency-tree
branch
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR o'clock
Description
References #888.
This PR exposes the
cluster_https_worker_ingresssecurity group rule as an output value.Motivation
In order to ensure proper ordering when running
terraform destroy, I need to be able to establish an explicit dependency on the exposed resource because that resource allows pods to communicate with the control plane. Without being able to declare the dependency, terraform will likely destroy the rule early, which will prevent other resources from proper destruction.Checklist