Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update azurerm_policy_set_definition - deprecate management_group_id in favour of management_group_name to align behaviour in azurerm_policy_definition #6943

Merged

Conversation

ArcturusZhang
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #6893

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ArcturusZhang - LGTM 👍

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 4497367 into hashicorp:master Jul 9, 2020
@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.18.0 milestone Jul 9, 2020
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 10, 2020

This has been released in version 2.18.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.18.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang deleted the unify-mgmt-name-for-set-definition branch July 10, 2020 03:34
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 9, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

azurerm_policy*_definition.management_group_* attribute inconsistency
2 participants