Requested port X is not mapped with jenkins kubernates dind #4307
Comments
|
Hey @abhishek-rdm, can you please specify how you create the container? |
|
@kiview sure |
|
Thanks. And this test works when running with local Docker? Note that you did not share your call to |
|
|
|
Just to clarify, you aren't calling From the last answer, it is not clear to me, if you can run the test successfully with a local Docker. Also, did this issue occur after switching to another Testcontainers version, or did it never work with your Jenkins setup? |
Thanks for noticing I just now changed it to Containers.WIREMOCK.getMappedPort(8080), but it still did not work.
Yes, it just works on my local machine and the test cases pass, I did not manage to run it on Jenkins setup, it always fail there. Also, I am using version 1.15.3, but switching to 1.16.0 also results in the same error on Jenkins. |
|
Exact error when Jenkins inside the kube with the localstack container (4566)
@Shared
public static final LocalStackContainer localstack;
static {
localstack = new LocalStackContainer(localstackImage)
.withServices(LocalStackContainer.Service.SSM, LocalStackContainer.Service.S3,
LocalStackContainer.Service.SECRETSMANAGER)
.withStartupTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(300))
.withExposedPorts(4566,4571)
.withLogConsumer(new Slf4jLogConsumer(logger))
.waitingFor(Wait.forLogMessage(".*Execution of \"start_api_services\" took.*",1));
localstack.start();
} |
|
Have you tried Testcontainers 1.16.0? |
|
Hi @bsideup , Many thanks for your reply, yes I tried with 1.16.0 there, I have't managed to get the tests itslef. mentioning " no bridge network found" --> [EKS with jenkins agent runs a pod]set then I switch back to 1.15.3 pretty much started app able start and execute but the container which spawned doest have the ports exposed despite on the other note, I disabled the ryuk as I couldn't fine a way to enable ryuk port(8080) exposed, therwise I was getting - requested port 8080 not exposed error. here I am pasting the docker inspect where I cant see the exposed ports. |
|
@bkosaraju FYI you're getting the same result, just 1.16.0 fails faster - consider keeping it. Also, disabling Ryuk makes no sense if it fails with the same error. Could you please share full output of |
|
Hi @bsideup , As suggested this time I ran with Docker Inspect.. |
|
@bkosaraju so, it looks like your Docker isn't assigning any ports: "PortBindings": {
"8080/tcp": [
{
"HostIp": "",
"HostPort": ""
}
]
},Which sounds like a problem with Docker, not Testcontainers :) |
|
Thanks @bsideup , Indeed, this pointed me right direction for investigation. I eventually managed this working with following options.
TESTCONTAINERS_RYUK_DISABLED=true;
TESTCONTAINERS_HOST_OVERRIDE=172.31.0.1 #<-- to avoid bridge network not found private static Network createInternalBridgeNetwork() {
Consumer<CreateNetworkCmd> cmdModifier = (createNetworkCmd) -> {
com.github.dockerjava.api.model.Network.Ipam.Config ipamConfig = new com.github.dockerjava.api.model.Network.Ipam.Config()
.withSubnet("172.31.0.1/24")
createNetworkCmd.withDriver("bridge")
.withIpam(new com.github.dockerjava.api.model.Network.Ipam().withConfig(ipamConfig));
};
return Network.builder()
.createNetworkCmdModifier(cmdModifier)
.build();
}
public static Network network = createInternalBridgeNetwork();
@Shared
public static final LocalStackContainer localstack;
static {
localstack = new LocalStackContainer(localstackImage)
.withServices(LocalStackContainer.Service.SSM, LocalStackContainer.Service.S3,
LocalStackContainer.Service.SECRETSMANAGER)
.withStartupTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(300))
.withNetwork(network)
.withExposedPorts(4566)
.withPrivilegedMode(true)
.withLogConsumer(new Slf4jLogConsumer(logger))
.waitingFor(Wait.forLogMessage(".*Execution of \"start_api_services\" took.*", 1));
localstack.start();
}```` |
|
@bkosaraju see https://www.testcontainers.org/features/configuration/#customizing-ryuk-resource-reaper Although I would still try to configure bridge network |
|
@bkosaraju the solution works for me as well thanks a lot. |
|
@abhishek-rdm creating a bridge network is a workaround, not a solution. The big question is why the default bridge network is missing. Perhaps you could try configuring the daemon? |
|
Thanks @bsideup , Sure, certainly configuring bridge is a clean option with two caveats.
that being said, in case if we have an option to specify the network name instead of hardcoded name "bridge" at https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/testcontainers/dockerclient/DockerClientProviderStrategy.java#L278 it would be just a config option similar to TESTCONTAINERS_HOST_OVERRIDE, also ryuk would be great help to manage resources. though I configured separately, I feel its not quite right to take lifecycle of container management in to my hands and implement, as we have a well organised ryuk. All in all, at this moment TESTCONTAINERS_HOST_OVERRIDE and RYUK both exclusive to me, and the options can be configured at RYUK, not all available in terms of networks. On the side node I try to override some of the options with custom didn't seems to pick either. |
Description: Requested port X is not mapped when running with Jenkins Kubernetes docker in docker.
Containers.POSTGRES.getMappedPort(X)
Current behavior: Requested port (X) is not mapped
Expected behavior: API should return the assigned port.
Version: 1.15.3
Logs:
testcontainer_logs.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: