-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Story] Add capability management to Draupnir and MPS #6
Comments
Closed
All of the internals that make this work are implemented fwiw, there's just no configuration or exposed UX. There's also no "dummy/blank" capabilities to use to plug interfaces safely. |
Gnuxie
changed the title
[Story] Add capability management to MPS
[Story] Add capability management to Draupnir and MPS
Jul 15, 2024
Hm, I don't think we have a "compatible providers" list yet, and i forgot about using that term |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
As a protection developer, I should be able to describe the interface and dependencies needed by my protection to take actions in a room. Then provide an implementation for both "no operation" mode and the standard functionality. These implementations are called "capability providers".
As a draupnir moderator, I can see the active capability provider for each protection and read about the capability providers that they are compatible with. I should then be able to change the active capability provider for each protection as I see fit.
Acceptance Criteria
Issues
Dependencies
Dependants
Total Pain
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: