Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
735 lines (608 loc) · 35.5 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

735 lines (608 loc) · 35.5 KB

Go Reference tests Go Report Card codecov GitHub release (latest SemVer) GitHub go.mod Go version

Fox

Fox is a zero allocation, lightweight, high performance HTTP request router for Go. The main difference with other routers is that it supports mutation on its routing tree while handling request concurrently. Internally, Fox use a Radix Tree that support lock-free reads while allowing concurrent write. The router tree is optimized for high-concurrency and high performance reads, and low-concurrency write.

Fox supports various use cases, but it is especially designed for applications that require frequent changes at runtime to their routing structure based on user input, configuration changes, or other runtime events.

Disclaimer

The current api is not yet stabilize. Breaking changes may occur before v1.0.0 and will be noted on the release note.

Features

Runtime updates: Register, update and delete route handler safely at any time without impact on performance. Fox never block while serving request!

Wildcard pattern: Route can be registered using wildcard parameters. The matched segment can then be easily retrieved by name. Due to Fox design, wildcard route are cheap and scale really well.

Hostname matching: Fox supports hostname-based routing with wildcard matching.

Flexible routing: Fox strikes a balance between routing flexibility, performance and clarity by enforcing clear priority rules, ensuring that there are no unintended matches and maintaining high performance even for complex routing pattern.

Redirect trailing slashes: Redirect automatically the client, at no extra cost, if another route matches, with or without a trailing slash.

Ignore trailing slashes: In contrast to redirecting, this option allows the router to handle requests regardless of an extra or missing trailing slash, at no extra cost.

Automatic OPTIONS replies: Fox has built-in native support for OPTIONS requests.

Get the current route: You can easily retrieve the route of the matched request. This actually makes it easier to integrate observability middleware like open telemetry.

Client IP Derivation: Accurately determine the "real" client IP address using best practices tailored to your network topology.

Rich middleware ecosystem: Fox offers a robust ecosystem of prebuilt, high-quality middlewares, ready to integrate into your application.

Of course, you can also register custom NotFound and MethodNotAllowed handlers.

Getting started

Installation

With a correctly configured Go toolchain:

go get -u github.com/tigerwill90/fox

Basic example

package main

import (
	"errors"
	"github.com/tigerwill90/fox"
	"log"
	"net/http"
)

func main() {
	f := fox.New(fox.DefaultOptions())

	f.MustHandle(http.MethodGet, "/hello/{name}", func(c fox.Context) {
		_ = c.String(http.StatusOK, "hello %s\n", c.Param("name"))
	})

	if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", f); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, http.ErrServerClosed) {
		log.Fatalln(err)
	}
}

Error handling

Since new route may be added at any given time, Fox, unlike other router, does not panic when a route is malformed or conflicts with another. Instead, it returns the following error values:

ErrRouteExist    = errors.New("route already registered")
ErrRouteConflict = errors.New("route conflict")
ErrInvalidRoute  = errors.New("invalid route")

Conflict error may be unwrapped to retrieve conflicting route.

if errors.Is(err, fox.ErrRouteConflict) {
    matched := err.(*fox.RouteConflictError).Matched
    for _, route := range matched {
        fmt.Println(route)
    }
}

Named parameters

Routes can include named parameters using curly braces {} to match exactly one non-empty route segment. The matching segment are recorder into fox.Param accessible via fox.Context. fox.Context.Params provide an iterator to range over fox.Param and fox.Context.Param allow to retrieve directly the value of a parameter using the placeholder name. Named parameters are supported anywhere in the route, but only one parameter is allowed per segment (or hostname label) and must appear at the end of the segment.

Pattern /avengers/{name}

/avengers/ironman           matches
/avengers/thor              matches
/avengers/hulk/angry        no matches
/avengers/                  no matches

Pattern /users/uuid:{id}

/users/uuid:123             matches
/users/uuid:                no matches

Pattern /users/uuid:{id}/config

/users/uuid:123/config      matches
/users/uuid:/config         no matches

Named parameters are also supported in hostname. Note that the path portion must still include at least /.

Pattern example.com/avengers

example.com/avengers            matches
{sub}.com/avengers              matches
example.{tld}/avengers          matches
{sub}.example.com/avengers      no matches

Catch-all parameter

Catch-all parameters start with an asterisk * followed by a name {param} and match one or more non-empty route segments, including slashes. The matching segment are also accessible via fox.Context. Catch-all parameters are supported anywhere in the route, but only one parameter is allowed per segment and must appear at the end of the segment. Consecutive catch-all parameter are not allowed.

Example with ending catch all

Pattern /src/*{filepath}

/src/conf.txt               matches
/src/dir/config.txt         matches
/src/                       no matches

Pattern /src/file=*{path}

/src/file=config.txt        matches
/src/file=/dir/config.txt   matches
/src/file=                  no matches

Example with infix catch all

Pattern: /assets/*{path}/thumbnail

/assets/images/thumbnail            matches
/assets/photos/2021/thumbnail       matches
/assets/thumbnail                   no matches

Pattern: /assets/path:*{path}/thumbnail

/assets/path:images/thumbnail       matches
/assets/path:photos/2021/thumbnail  matches
/assets/path:thumbnail              no matches

Note that catch-all patterns are not supported in hostname.

Hostname validation & restrictions

Hostnames are validated to conform to the LDH (letters, digits, hyphens) rule. Wildcard segments within hostnames, such as {a}.b.c/, are exempt from LDH validation since they act as placeholders rather than actual domain labels. As such, they do not count toward the hard limit of 63 characters per label, nor the 255-character limit for the full hostname (including periods). Internationalized domain names (IDNs) should be specified using an ASCII (Punycode) representation.

The DNS specification permits a trailing period to be used to denote the root, e.g., a.b.c and a.b.c. are equivalent, but the latter is more explicit and is required to be accepted by applications. Fox will reject route registered with trailing period. However, the router will automatically strip any trailing period from incoming request host so it can match the route regardless of a trailing period. Note that FQDN (with trailing period) does not play well with golang TLS stdlib (see traefik/traefik#9157 (comment)).

Priority rules

Routes are prioritized based on specificity, with static segments taking precedence over wildcard segments.

The following rules apply:

  • Routes with hostnames are evaluated first, before any path-only routes.
  • If no route matches with a hostname, the router falls back to matching path-only routes. Path-only routes match requests with any hostname.
  • Static segments are always evaluated first.
  • A named parameter can only overlap with a catch-all parameter or static segments.
  • A catch-all parameter can only overlap with a named parameter or static segments.
  • When a named parameter overlaps with a catch-all parameter, the named parameter is evaluated first.

For instance, GET /users/{id} and GET /users/{name}/profile cannot coexist, as the {id} and {name} segments are overlapping. These limitations help to minimize the number of branches that need to be evaluated in order to find the right match, thereby maintaining high-performance routing.

For example, the followings route are allowed:

GET /*{filepath}
GET /users/{id}
GET /users/{id}/emails
GET /users/{id}/{actions}
POST /users/{name}/emails

Additionally, let's consider an example to illustrate the prioritization:

Route Definitions:

1. GET /fs/avengers.txt          # Highest priority (static)
2. GET /fs/{filename}            # Next priority (named parameter)
3. GET /fs/*{filepath}           # Lowest priority (catch-all parameter)

Request Matching:

- /fs/avengers.txt              matches Route 1
- /fs/ironman.txt               matches Route 2
- /fs/avengers/ironman.txt      matches Route 3
Hostname routing

The router can transition instantly and transparently from path-only mode to hostname-prioritized mode without any additional configuration or action. If any route with a hostname is registered, the router automatically switches to prioritize hostname matching. Conversely, if no hostname-specific routes are registered, the router reverts to path-priority mode, ensuring optimal and adaptive routing behavior.

  • If the routing tree for a given method has no routes registered with hostnames, the router will perform a path-based lookup only.
  • If the routing tree for a given method includes at least one route with a hostname, the router will prioritize lookup based on the request host and path. If no match is found, the router will then fall back to a path-only lookup.
  • Trailing slash handling (redirect or ignore) is mode-specific, either for hostname-prioritized or path-prioritized mode. Therefore, if no exact match is found for a domain-based lookup but a trailing slash adjustment is possible, Fox will perform the redirect (or ignore the trailing slash) without falling back to path-only lookup.

Warning about context

The fox.Context instance is freed once the request handler function returns to optimize resource allocation. If you need to retain fox.Context beyond the scope of the handler, use the fox.Context.Clone methods.

func Hello(c fox.Context) {
    cc := c.Clone()
    go func() {
        time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
        log.Println(cc.Param("name")) // Safe
    }()
    _ = c.String(http.StatusOK, "Hello %s\n", c.Param("name"))
}

Concurrency

Fox implements an immutable Radix Tree that supports uncoordinated read while allowing a single writer to make progress. Updates are applied by calculating the change which would be made to the tree were it mutable, assembling those changes into a patch which is propagated to the root and applied in a single atomic operation. The result is a shallow copy of the tree, where only the modified path and its ancestors are cloned, ensuring efficient updates and minimal memory overhead. Multiple patches can be applied in a single transaction, with intermediate nodes cached during the process to prevent redundant cloning.

Other key points

  • Routing requests is lock-free (reading thread never block, even while writes are ongoing)
  • The router always see a consistent version of the tree while routing request
  • Reading threads do not block writing threads (adding, updating or removing a handler can be done concurrently)
  • Writing threads block each other but never block reading threads

As such threads that route requests should never encounter latency due to ongoing writes or other concurrent readers.

Managing routes a runtime

Routing mutation

In this example, the handler for routes/{action} allow to dynamically register, update and delete handler for the given route and method. Thanks to Fox's design, those actions are perfectly safe and may be executed concurrently.

package main

import (
	"encoding/json"
	"errors"
	"fmt"
	"github.com/tigerwill90/fox"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"strings"
)

func Action(c fox.Context) {
	var data map[string]string
	if err := json.NewDecoder(c.Request().Body).Decode(&data); err != nil {
		http.Error(c.Writer(), err.Error(), http.StatusBadRequest)
		return
	}

	method := strings.ToUpper(data["method"])
	path := data["path"]
	text := data["text"]

	if path == "" || method == "" {
		http.Error(c.Writer(), "missing method or path", http.StatusBadRequest)
		return
	}

	var err error
	action := c.Param("action")
	switch action {
	case "add":
		_, err = c.Fox().Handle(method, path, func(c fox.Context) {
			_ = c.String(http.StatusOK, text)
		})
	case "update":
		_, err = c.Fox().Update(method, path, func(c fox.Context) {
			_ = c.String(http.StatusOK, text)
		})
	case "delete":
		err = c.Fox().Delete(method, path)
	default:
		http.Error(c.Writer(), fmt.Sprintf("action %q is not allowed", action), http.StatusBadRequest)
		return
	}
	if err != nil {
		http.Error(c.Writer(), err.Error(), http.StatusConflict)
		return
	}

	_ = c.String(http.StatusOK, "%s route [%s] %s: success\n", action, method, path)
}

func main() {
	f := fox.New(fox.DefaultOptions())
	f.MustHandle(http.MethodPost, "/routes/{action}", Action)
	
	if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", f); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, http.ErrServerClosed) {
		log.Fatalln(err)
	}
}

ACID Transaction

Fox supports read-write and read-only transactions (with Atomicity, Consistency, and Isolation; Durability is not supported as transactions are in memory). Thread that route requests always see a consistent version of the routing tree and are fully isolated from an ongoing transaction until committed. Read-only transactions capture a point-in-time snapshot of the tree, ensuring they do not observe any ongoing or committed changes made after their creation.

Managed read-write transaction

// Updates executes a function within the context of a read-write managed transaction. If no error is returned
// from the function then the transaction is committed. If an error is returned then the entire transaction is
// aborted.
if err := f.Updates(func(txn *fox.Txn) error {
	if _, err := txn.Handle(http.MethodGet, "exemple.com/hello/{name}", Handler); err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// Iter returns a collection of range iterators for traversing registered routes.
	it := txn.Iter()
	// When Iter() is called on a write transaction, it creates a point-in-time snapshot of the transaction state.
	// It means that writing on the current transaction while iterating is allowed, but the mutation will not be
	// observed in the result returned by Prefix (or any other iterator).
	for method, route := range it.Prefix(it.Methods(), "tmp.exemple.com/") {
		if err := f.Delete(method, route.Pattern()); err != nil {
			return err
		}
	}
	return nil
}); err != nil {
	log.Printf("transaction aborted: %s", err)
}

Unmanaged read-write transaction

// Txn create an unmanaged read-write or read-only transaction.
txn := f.Txn(true)
defer txn.Abort()

if _, err := txn.Handle(http.MethodGet, "exemple.com/hello/{name}", Handler); err != nil {
	log.Printf("error inserting route: %s", err)
	return
}

// Iter returns a collection of range iterators for traversing registered routes.
it := txn.Iter()
// When Iter() is called on a write transaction, it creates a point-in-time snapshot of the transaction state.
// It means that writing on the current transaction while iterating is allowed, but the mutation will not be
// observed in the result returned by Prefix (or any other iterator).
for method, route := range it.Prefix(it.Methods(), "tmp.exemple.com/") {
	if err := f.Delete(method, route.Pattern()); err != nil {
		log.Printf("error deleting route: %s", err)
		return
	}
}
// Finalize the transaction
txn.Commit()

Managed read-only transaction

_ = f.View(func(txn *fox.Txn) error {
	if txn.Has(http.MethodGet, "/foo") {
		if txn.Has(http.MethodGet, "/bar") {
			// do something
		}
	}
	return nil
})

Working with http.Handler

Fox itself implements the http.Handler interface which make easy to chain any compatible middleware before the router. Moreover, the router provides convenient fox.WrapF and fox.WrapH adapter to be use with http.Handler.

The route parameters can be accessed by the wrapped handler through the context.Context when the adapters fox.WrapF and fox.WrapH are used.

Wrapping an http.Handler

articles := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    params := fox.ParamsFromContext(r.Context())
    _, _ = fmt.Fprintf(w, "Article id: %s\n", params.Get("id"))
})

f := fox.New(fox.DefaultOptions())
f.MustHandle(http.MethodGet, "/articles/{id}", fox.WrapH(httpRateLimiter.RateLimit(articles)))

Middleware

Middlewares can be registered globally using the fox.WithMiddleware option. The example below demonstrates how to create and apply automatically a simple logging middleware to all routes (including 404, 405, etc...).

package main

import (
	"github.com/tigerwill90/fox"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"time"
)

func Logger(next fox.HandlerFunc) fox.HandlerFunc {
	return func(c fox.Context) {
		start := time.Now()
		next(c)
		log.Printf("route: %s, latency: %s, status: %d, size: %d",
			c.Pattern(),
			time.Since(start),
			c.Writer().Status(),
			c.Writer().Size(),
		)
	}
}

func main() {
	f := fox.New(fox.WithMiddleware(Logger))

	f.MustHandle(http.MethodGet, "/", func(c fox.Context) {
		resp, err := http.Get("https://api.coindesk.com/v1/bpi/currentprice.json")
		if err != nil {
			http.Error(c.Writer(), http.StatusText(http.StatusInternalServerError), http.StatusInternalServerError)
			return
		}
		defer resp.Body.Close()
		_ = c.Stream(http.StatusOK, fox.MIMEApplicationJSON, resp.Body)
	})

	log.Fatalln(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", f))
}

Additionally, fox.WithMiddlewareFor option provide a more fine-grained control over where a middleware is applied, such as only for 404 or 405 handlers. Possible scopes include fox.RouteHandlers (regular routes), fox.NoRouteHandler, fox.NoMethodHandler, fox.RedirectHandler, fox.OptionsHandler and any combination of these.

f := fox.New(
    fox.WithNoMethod(true),
    fox.WithMiddlewareFor(fox.RouteHandler, fox.Recovery(), Logger),
    fox.WithMiddlewareFor(fox.NoRouteHandler|fox.NoMethodHandler, SpecialLogger),
)

Finally, it's also possible to attaches middleware on a per-route basis. Note that route-specific middleware must be explicitly reapplied when updating a route. If not, any middleware will be removed, and the route will fall back to using only global middleware (if any).

f := fox.New(
	fox.WithMiddleware(fox.Logger()),
)
f.MustHandle("GET", "/", SomeHandler, fox.WithMiddleware(foxtimeout.Middleware(2*time.Second)))
f.MustHandle("GET", "/foo", SomeOtherHandler)

Official middlewares

Handling OPTIONS Requests and CORS Automatically

The WithAutoOptions setting or the WithOptionsHandler registration enable automatic responses to OPTIONS requests. This feature can be particularly useful in the context of Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS).

An OPTIONS request is a type of HTTP request that is used to determine the communication options available for a given resource or API endpoint. These requests are commonly used as "preflight" requests in CORS to check if the CORS protocol is understood and to get permission to access data based on origin.

When automatic OPTIONS responses is enabled, the router will automatically respond to preflight OPTIONS requests and set the Allow header with the appropriate value. To customize how OPTIONS requests are handled (e.g. adding CORS headers), you may register a middleware for the fox.OptionsHandler scope or override the default handler.

f := fox.New(
    fox.WithOptionsHandler(func(c fox.Context) {
        if c.Header("Access-Control-Request-Method") != "" {
            // Setting CORS headers.
            c.SetHeader("Access-Control-Allow-Methods", c.Writer().Header().Get("Allow"))
            c.SetHeader("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*")
        }

        // Respond with a 204 status code.
        c.Writer().WriteHeader(http.StatusNoContent)
    }),
)

Resolving Client IP

The WithClientIPResolver option allows you to set up strategies to resolve the client IP address based on your use case and network topology. Accurately determining the client IP is hard, particularly in environments with proxies or load balancers. For example, the leftmost IP in the X-Forwarded-For header is commonly used and is often regarded as the "closest to the client" and "most real," but it can be easily spoofed. Therefore, you should absolutely avoid using it for any security-related purposes, such as request throttling.

The resolver used must be chosen and tuned for your network configuration. This should result in a resolver never returning an error and if it does, it should be treated as an application issue or a misconfiguration, rather than defaulting to an untrustworthy IP.

The sub-package github.com/tigerwill90/fox/clientip provides a set of best practices resolvers that should cover most use cases.

f := fox.New(
	fox.DefaultOptions(),
	fox.WithClientIPResolver(
		// We are behind one or many trusted proxies that have all private-space IP addresses.
		clientip.Must(clientip.NewRightmostNonPrivate(clientip.XForwardedForKey)),
	),
)

f.MustHandle(http.MethodGet, "/foo/bar", func(c fox.Context) {
	ipAddr, err := c.ClientIP()
	if err != nil {
		// If the current resolver is not able to derive the client IP, an error
		// will be returned rather than falling back on an untrustworthy IP. It
		// should be treated as an application issue or a misconfiguration.
		panic(err)
	}
	fmt.Println(ipAddr.String())
})

It is also possible to create a chain with multiple resolvers that attempt to derive the client IP, stopping when the first one succeeds.

f = fox.New(
	fox.DefaultOptions(),
	fox.WithClientIPResolver(
		// A common use for this is if a server is both directly connected to the
		// internet and expecting a header to check.
		clientip.NewChain(
			clientip.Must(clientip.NewLeftmostNonPrivate(clientip.ForwardedKey, 10)),
			clientip.NewRemoteAddr(),
		),
	),
)

Note that there is no "sane" default strategy, so calling Context.ClientIP without a resolver configured will return an ErrNoClientIPResolver.

See this blog post for general guidance on choosing a strategy that fit your needs.

Benchmark

The primary goal of Fox is to be a lightweight, high performance router which allow routes modification at runtime. The following benchmarks attempt to compare Fox to various popular alternatives, including both fully-featured web frameworks and lightweight request routers. These benchmarks are based on the julienschmidt/go-http-routing-benchmark repository.

Please note that these benchmarks should not be taken too seriously, as the comparison may not be entirely fair due to the differences in feature sets offered by each framework. Performance should be evaluated in the context of your specific use case and requirements. While Fox aims to excel in performance, it's important to consider the trade-offs and functionality provided by different web frameworks and routers when making your selection.

Config

GOOS:   Linux
GOARCH: amd64
GO:     1.20
CPU:    Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz

Static Routes

It is just a collection of random static paths inspired by the structure of the Go directory. It might not be a realistic URL-structure.

GOMAXPROCS: 1

BenchmarkHttpRouter_StaticAll     161659              7570 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_StaticAll    132446              8836 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkFox_StaticAll            102577             11348 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkStdMux_StaticAll          91304             13382 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkGin_StaticAll             78224             15433 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkEcho_StaticAll            77923             15739 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkBeego_StaticAll           10000            101094 ns/op           55264 B/op        471 allocs/op
BenchmarkGorillaMux_StaticAll       2283            525683 ns/op          113041 B/op       1099 allocs/op
BenchmarkMartini_StaticAll          1330            936928 ns/op          129210 B/op       2031 allocs/op
BenchmarkTraffic_StaticAll          1064           1140959 ns/op          753611 B/op      14601 allocs/op
BenchmarkPat_StaticAll               967           1230424 ns/op          602832 B/op      12559 allocs/op

In this benchmark, Fox performs as well as Gin and Echo which are both Radix Tree based routers. An interesting fact is that HttpTreeMux also support adding route while serving request concurrently. However, it takes a slightly different approach, by using an optional RWMutex that may not scale as well as Fox under heavy load. The next test compare HttpTreeMux with and without the *SafeAddRouteFlag (concurrent reads and writes) and Fox in parallel benchmark.

GOMAXPROCS: 16

Route: all

BenchmarkFox_StaticAll-16                          99322             11369 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkFox_StaticAllParallel-16                 831354              1422 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_StaticAll-16                 135560              8861 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_StaticAllParallel-16*        172714              6916 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op

As you can see, this benchmark highlight the cost of using higher synchronisation primitive like RWMutex to be able to register new route while handling requests.

Micro Benchmarks

The following benchmarks measure the cost of some very basic operations.

In the first benchmark, only a single route, containing a parameter, is loaded into the routers. Then a request for a URL matching this pattern is made and the router has to call the respective registered handler function. End.

GOMAXPROCS: 1

BenchmarkFox_Param              33024534                36.61 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkEcho_Param             31472508                38.71 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkGin_Param              25826832                52.88 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpRouter_Param       21230490                60.83 ns/op           32 B/op          1 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_Param       3960292                280.4 ns/op          352 B/op          3 allocs/op
BenchmarkBeego_Param             2247776                518.9 ns/op          352 B/op          3 allocs/op
BenchmarkPat_Param               1603902                676.6 ns/op          512 B/op         10 allocs/op
BenchmarkGorillaMux_Param        1000000                 1011 ns/op         1024 B/op          8 allocs/op
BenchmarkTraffic_Param            648986                 1686 ns/op         1848 B/op         21 allocs/op
BenchmarkMartini_Param            485839                 2446 ns/op         1096 B/op         12 allocs/op

Same as before, but now with multiple parameters, all in the same single route. The intention is to see how the routers scale with the number of parameters.

GOMAXPROCS: 1

BenchmarkFox_Param5             16608495                72.84 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkGin_Param5             13098740                92.22 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkEcho_Param5            12025460                96.33 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpRouter_Param5       8233530                148.1 ns/op          160 B/op          1 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_Param5      1986019                616.9 ns/op          576 B/op          6 allocs/op
BenchmarkBeego_Param5            1836229                655.3 ns/op          352 B/op          3 allocs/op
BenchmarkGorillaMux_Param5        757936                 1572 ns/op         1088 B/op          8 allocs/op
BenchmarkPat_Param5               645847                 1724 ns/op          800 B/op         24 allocs/op
BenchmarkTraffic_Param5           424431                 2729 ns/op         2200 B/op         27 allocs/op
BenchmarkMartini_Param5           424806                 2772 ns/op         1256 B/op         13 allocs/op


BenchmarkGin_Param20             4636416               244.6 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkFox_Param20             4667533               250.7 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkEcho_Param20            4352486               277.1 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpRouter_Param20      2618958               455.2 ns/op           640 B/op          1 allocs/op
BenchmarkBeego_Param20            847029                1688 ns/op           352 B/op          3 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_Param20      369500                2972 ns/op          3195 B/op         10 allocs/op
BenchmarkGorillaMux_Param20       318134                3561 ns/op          3195 B/op         10 allocs/op
BenchmarkMartini_Param20          223070                5117 ns/op          3619 B/op         15 allocs/op
BenchmarkPat_Param20              157380                7442 ns/op          4094 B/op         73 allocs/op
BenchmarkTraffic_Param20          119677                9864 ns/op          7847 B/op         47 allocs/op

Now let's see how expensive it is to access a parameter. The handler function reads the value (by the name of the parameter, e.g. with a map lookup; depends on the router) and writes it to /dev/null

GOMAXPROCS: 1

BenchmarkFox_ParamWrite                 16707409                72.53 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpRouter_ParamWrite          16478174                73.30 ns/op           32 B/op          1 allocs/op
BenchmarkGin_ParamWrite                 15828385                75.73 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkEcho_ParamWrite                13187766                95.18 ns/op            8 B/op          1 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_ParamWrite          4132832               279.9 ns/op           352 B/op          3 allocs/op
BenchmarkBeego_ParamWrite                2172572               554.3 ns/op           360 B/op          4 allocs/op
BenchmarkPat_ParamWrite                  1200334               996.8 ns/op           936 B/op         14 allocs/op
BenchmarkGorillaMux_ParamWrite           1000000              1005 ns/op            1024 B/op          8 allocs/op
BenchmarkMartini_ParamWrite               454255              2667 ns/op            1168 B/op         16 allocs/op
BenchmarkTraffic_ParamWrite               511766              2021 ns/op            2272 B/op         25 allocs/op

In those micro benchmarks, we can see that Fox scale really well, even with long wildcard routes. Like Gin, this router reuse the data structure (e.g. fox.Context slice) containing the matching parameters in order to remove completely heap allocation.

Github

Finally, this benchmark execute a request for each GitHub API route (203 routes).

GOMAXPROCS: 1

BenchmarkFox_GithubAll             63984             18555 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkEcho_GithubAll            49312             23353 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkGin_GithubAll             48422             24926 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpRouter_GithubAll      45706             26818 ns/op           14240 B/op        171 allocs/op
BenchmarkHttpTreeMux_GithubAll     14731             80133 ns/op           67648 B/op        691 allocs/op
BenchmarkBeego_GithubAll            7692            137926 ns/op           72929 B/op        625 allocs/op
BenchmarkTraffic_GithubAll           636           1916586 ns/op          845114 B/op      14634 allocs/op
BenchmarkMartini_GithubAll           530           2205947 ns/op          238546 B/op       2813 allocs/op
BenchmarkGorillaMux_GithubAll        529           2246380 ns/op          203844 B/op       1620 allocs/op
BenchmarkPat_GithubAll               424           2899405 ns/op         1843501 B/op      29064 allocs/op

Road to v1

Contributions

This project aims to provide a lightweight, high performance and easy to use http router. It purposely has a limited set of features and exposes a relatively low-level api. The intention behind these choices is that it can serve as a building block for implementing your own "batteries included" frameworks. Feature requests and PRs along these lines are welcome.

Acknowledgements