Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pros and cons compared with Apache HttpClient or java.net package #11

Open
leewi9 opened this issue Apr 23, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

pros and cons compared with Apache HttpClient or java.net package #11

leewi9 opened this issue Apr 23, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@leewi9
Copy link

leewi9 commented Apr 23, 2017

Since Apache HttpClient or java.net package can also do http, any doc about this ?

@jjhart
Copy link

jjhart commented Apr 23, 2017

This package is async (nonblocking); those libraries are blocking... pretty big difference. This package is more similar to the newer Apache HttpAsyncClient (which i haven't looked at in enough depth to give a better answer).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants