We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
refit
backtest
After adding possibility to forecast on future with gap, we can modify our backtest to work with this feature.
Add parameter refit into BasePipeline.backtest.
BasePipeline.backtest
Possible values:
True
False
value: int
value
refit=False
How to make this change:
BasePipeline._run_fold
refit=True
refit: int = 1
refit: int = n_folds
To discuss: what to do with FoldMask?
FoldMask
n_jobs
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closed by #1159.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Mr-Geekman
No branches or pull requests
🚀 Feature Request
After adding possibility to forecast on future with gap, we can modify our backtest to work with this feature.
Proposal
Add parameter
refit
intoBasePipeline.backtest
.Possible values:
True
(default)False
value: int
value
folds starting from the earliestrefit=False
How to make this change:
BasePipeline.backtest
into a separate methodBasePipeline._run_fold
to return fitted pipeline and accept fitted pipelinerefit=True
asrefit: int = 1
, because we consider each fold to be in the separate grouprefit=False
asrefit: int = n_folds
, because we consider all folds to be in the same groupTo discuss: what to do with
FoldMask
?Test cases
n_jobs
doesn't influence the results with differentrefit
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: