This package allows you to emulate arbitrary TON smart contracts, send messages to them and run get methods on them as if they were deployed on a real network.
The key difference of this package from ton-contract-executor is the fact that the latter only emulates the compute phase of the contract - it does not know about any other phases and thus does not know anything about fees and balances (in a sense that it does not know whether a contract's balance will be enough to process all the out messages that it produces). On the other hand, this package emulates all the phases of a contract, and as a result, the emulation is much closer to what would happen in a real network.
- Instalation
- Usage
- Writing Tests
- Sandbox pitfalls
- Viewing logs
- Setting smart contract state directly
- Using snapshots
- Performing testing on contracts from a real network
- Step-by-step execution
- Network/Block configuration
- Contributors
- License
- Donations
Requires node 16 or higher.
yarn add @ton/sandbox @ton/ton @ton/core @ton/crypto
or
npm i @ton/sandbox @ton/ton @ton/core @ton/crypto
To use this package, you need to create an instance of the Blockchain
class using the static method Blockchain.create
as follows:
import { Blockchain } from "@ton/sandbox";
const blockchain = await Blockchain.create()
After that, you can use the low level methods on Blockchain (such as sendMessage) to emulate any messages that you want, but the recommended way to use it is to write wrappers for your contract using the Contract
interface from @ton/core
. Then you can use blockchain.openContract
on instances of such contracts, and they will be wrapped in a Proxy that will supply a ContractProvider
as a first argument to all its methods starting with either get
or send
. Also all send
methods will get Promisified and will return results of running the blockchain message queue along with the original method's result in the result
field.
A good example of this is the treasury contract that is basically a built-in highload wallet meant to help you write tests for your systems of smart contracts. When blockchain.treasury
is called, an instance of TreasuryContract
is created and blockchain.openContract
is called to "open" it. After that, when you call treasury.send
, Blockchain
automatically supplies the first provider
argument.
For your own contracts, you can draw inspiration from the contracts in the examples - all of them use the provider.internal
method to send internal messages using the treasuries passed in from the unit test file.
Here is an excerpt of that from NftItem.ts:
import { Address, beginCell, Cell, Contract, ContractProvider, Sender, toNano, Builder } from "@ton/core";
class NftItem implements Contract {
async sendTransfer(provider: ContractProvider, via: Sender, params: {
value?: bigint
to: Address
responseTo?: Address
forwardAmount?: bigint
forwardBody?: Cell | Builder
}) {
await provider.internal(via, {
value: params.value ?? toNano('0.05'),
body: beginCell()
.storeUint(0x5fcc3d14, 32) // op
.storeUint(0, 64) // query id
.storeAddress(params.to)
.storeAddress(params.responseTo)
.storeBit(false) // custom payload
.storeCoins(params.forwardAmount ?? 0n)
.storeMaybeRef(params.forwardBody)
.endCell()
})
}
}
When you call nftItem.sendTransfer(treasury.getSender(), { to: recipient })
(with nftItem
being an "opened" instance of NftItem
), an external message to the wallet represented by treasury
will be pushed onto the message queue, then processed, generating an internal message to the NFT contract.
Here is another excerpt that shows the way to interact with get methods from wrappers:
import { Contract, ContractProvider } from "@ton/core";
export type NftItemData = {
inited: boolean
index: number
collection: Address | null
owner: Address | null
content: Cell | null
}
class NftItem implements Contract {
async getData(provider: ContractProvider): Promise<NftItemData> {
const { stack } = await provider.get('get_nft_data', [])
return {
inited: stack.readBoolean(),
index: stack.readNumber(),
collection: stack.readAddressOpt(),
owner: stack.readAddressOpt(),
content: stack.readCellOpt(),
}
}
}
When you call nftItem.getData()
(note that just like in the sendTransfer
method, you don't need to supply the provider
argument - it's done for you on "opened" instances), the provider
will query the smart contract contained in blockchain and parse the data according to the code. Note that unlike the send
methods, get
methods on "opened" instances will return the original result as-is to the caller.
Notes:
- All of the methods of contracts that you want to "open" that start with
get
orsend
NEED to acceptprovider: ContractProvider
as a first argument (even if not used) due to how the wrapper works. - You can open any contract at any address, even if it is not yet deployed or was deployed by a "parent" opened contract. The only requirement is that the
address
field (required by theContract
interface) is the address of the contract that you want to open, and thatinit
is present if you want to deploy using methods on the opened instance (in other cases,init
is not necessary). - Ideally, at most one call to either
provider.internal
orprovider.external
should be made within asend
method. Otherwise, you may get hard to interpret (but generally speaking correct) results. - No calls to
provider.external
orprovider.internal
should be made withinget
methods. Otherwise, you will get weird and wrong results in the followingsend
methods of any contract.
You can install additional @ton/test-utils
package by running yarn add @ton/test-utils -D
or npm i --save-dev @ton/test-utils
(with .toHaveTransaction
for jest or .transaction
or .to.have.transaction
for chai matcher) to add additional helpers for ease of testing. Don't forget to import them in your unit test files though!
Writing tests in Sandbox works through defining arbitary actions with the contract and comparing their results with the expected result, for example:
it('should execute with success', async () => { // description of the test case
const res = await main.sendMessage(sender.getSender(), toNano('0.05')); // performing an action with contract main and saving result in res
expect(res.transactions).toHaveTransaction({ // configure the expected result with expect() function
from: main.address, // set expected sender for transaction we want to test matcher properties from
success: true // set the desirable result using matcher property success
});
printTransactionFees(res.transactions); // print table with details on spent fees
});
The basic workflow of creating a test is:
- Create a specific wrapped
Contract
entity usingblockchain.openContract()
. - Describe the actions your
Contract
should perform and save the execution result inres
variable. - Verify the properties using the
expect()
function and the matchertoHaveTransaction()
.
The toHaveTransaction
matcher expects an object with any combination of fields from the FlatTransaction
type defined with the following properties
Name | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
from | Address? | Contract address of the message sender |
to | Address | Contract address of the message destination |
on | Address | Contract address of the message destination (Alternative name of the property to ). |
value | bigint? | Amount of Toncoins in the message in nanotons |
body | Cell | Message body defined as a Cell |
inMessageBounced | boolean? | Boolean flag Bounced. True - message is bounced, False - message is not bounced. |
inMessageBounceable | boolean? | Boolean flag Bounceable. True - message can be bounced, False - message can not be bounced. |
op | number? | Op code is the operation identifier number (crc32 from TL-B usually). Expected in the first 32 bits of a message body. |
initData | Cell? | InitData Cell. Used for contract deployment processes. |
initCode | Cell? | initCode Cell. Used for contract deployment processes. |
deploy | boolean | Custom Sandbox flag that indicates whether the contract was deployed during this transaction. True if contract before this transaction was not initialized and after this transaction became initialized. Otherwise - False. |
lt | bigint | Logical time (set by validators in a normal network, monotonically increases by a set interval in Sandbox). Used for defining order of transactions related to a certain contract |
now | bigint | Unix timestamp of the transaction |
outMessagesCount | number | Quantity of outbound messages in a certain transaction |
oldStatus | AccountStatus | AccountStatus before transaction execution |
endStatus | AccountStatus | AccountStatus after transaction execution |
totalFees | bigint? | Number of spent fees in nanotons |
aborted | boolean? | True - execution of certain transaction aborted and rollbacked because of errors or insufficient gas. Otherwise - False. |
destroyed | boolean? | True - if the existing contract was destroyed due to executing a certain transaction. Otherwise - False. |
exitCode | number? | TVM exit code (from compute phase) |
actionResultCode | number? | Action phase result code |
success | boolean? | Custom Sandbox flag that defines the resulting status of a certain transaction. True - if both the compute and the action phase succeeded. Otherwise - False. |
You can omit those that you're not interested in, and you can also pass in functions accepting those types returning booleans (true
meaning good) to check for example number ranges, message opcodes, etc. Note however that if a field is optional (like from?: Address
), then the function needs to accept the optional type, too.
Here is an excerpt of how it's used in the NFT collection example mentioned above:
const buyResult = await buyer.send({
to: sale.address,
value: price + toNano('1'),
sendMode: SendMode.PAY_GAS_SEPARATELY,
})
expect(buyResult.transactions).toHaveTransaction({
from: sale.address,
to: marketplace.address,
value: fee,
})
expect(buyResult.transactions).toHaveTransaction({
from: sale.address,
to: collection.address,
value: fee,
})
(in that example jest
is used)
It is possible to configure and update the current time of the Blockchain
, which allows one to inspect how much a contract would spend on storage fees.
Suppose we have a main
instance defined as a wrapped Contract
instance main = blockchain.openContract(/* non-wrapped Main instance */)
, and we wish to determine the amount of storage fees that will be accrued between two actions within a specified period.
it('should storage fees cost less than 1 TON', async () => {
const time1 = Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000); // current local unix time
const time2 = time1 + 365 * 24 * 60 * 60; // offset for a year
blockchain.now = time1; // set current time
const res1 = await main.sendMessage(sender.getSender(), toNano('0.05')); // preview of fees
printTransactionFees(res1.transactions);
blockchain.now = time2; // set current time
const res2 = await main.sendMessage(sender.getSender(), toNano('0.05')); // preview of fees
printTransactionFees(res2.transactions);
const tx2 = res2.transactions[1]; // extract the transaction that executed in a year
if (tx2.description.type !== 'generic') {
throw new Error('Generic transaction expected');
}
// Check that the storagePhase fees are less than 1 TON over the course of a year
expect(tx2.description.storagePhase?.storageFeesCollected).toBeLessThanOrEqual(toNano('1'));
});
The Sandbox emulates the entire process of executing cross-contract interactions as if they occurred on a real blockchain.
The result of sending a message (transfer) contains basic information about all transactions and actions.
You can verify all of these by creating specific requirements via expect()
for each action and transaction.
res = await main.sendMessage(...);
expect(res).toHaveTransaction(...) // test case
<...>
expect(res).toHaveTransaction(...) // test case
For instance, with Modern Jetton it's possible to test whether a mint
message results in minting to a new jetton wallet contract and returns the excess to the minter contract.
it('minter admin should be able to mint jettons', async () => {
// can mint from deployer
let initialTotalSupply = await jettonMinter.getTotalSupply();
const deployerJettonWallet = await userWallet(deployer.address);
let initialJettonBalance = toNano('1000.23');
const mintResult = await jettonMinter.sendMint(deployer.getSender(), deployer.address, initialJettonBalance, toNano('0.05'), toNano('1'));
expect(mintResult.transactions).toHaveTransaction({ // test transaction of deployment of a jetton wallet
from: jettonMinter.address,
to: deployerJettonWallet.address,
deploy: true,
});
expect(mintResult.transactions).toHaveTransaction({ // test transaction of excesses returned to minter
from: deployerJettonWallet.address,
to: jettonMinter.address
});
});
In order to make sure that the contract will work as expected, you need to follow the following points in testing
- Test positive flows to make sure your contracts work
- Test negative flows to make sure that smart contracts behave correctly under abnormal conditions. Abnormal conditions includes:
- incorrect input
- action list overflow
- insufficient toncoin amount
- integer overflow
- owner assertions
More information about testing key points can be found here:
You can typically find various tests for Sandbox-based project contracts in the ./tests
directory.
Learn more from examples:
There are several pitfalls in the sandbox due to the limitations of emulation. Be aware of it while testing your smart contracts.
- Libs cells not updating in contract by
SETLIBCODE
,CHANGELIB
. They need to be updated manually.
const blockchain = await Blockchain.create();
const code = await compile('Contract');
// consist of a hash of a lib cell and its representation
const libsDict = Dictionary.empty(Dictionary.Keys.Buffer(32), Dictionary.Values.Cell());
libsDict.set(code.hash(), code);
// manualy set libs
blockchain.libs = beginCell().storeDictDirect(libsDict).endCell();
- There is no blocks in emulation, so opcodes like
PREVBLOCKSINFO
,PREVMCBLOCKS
,PREVKEYBLOCK
will return empty tuple. - The randomness in the TON is always deterministic and the same randomSeed always gives the same random number sequence. If necessary, you can change the randomSeed to make
RAND
provide result based on provided seed. Currently, there is no way to provide randomSeed in opened contracts.
const res = await blockchain.runGetMethod(example.address,
'get_method',
[],
{ randomSeed: randomBytes(32) }
);
const stack = new TupleReader(res.stack);
// read data from stack ...
- Because there is no concept of blocks in Sandbox, things like sharding do not work.
Blockchain
and SmartContract
use LogsVerbosity
to determine what kinds of logs to print. Here is the definition:
type LogsVerbosity = {
print: boolean
blockchainLogs: boolean
vmLogs: Verbosity
debugLogs: boolean
}
type Verbosity = 'none' | 'vm_logs' | 'vm_logs_full'
Setting verbosity on SmartContract
s works like an override with respect to what is set on Blockchain
.
debugLogs
is enabled by default on the Blockchain
instance (so every SmartContract
that does not have debugLogs
overridden will print debug logs), other kinds of logs are turned off.
print
determines whether to console.log
all the non-empty logs (if set to false
, logs will be collected but will only be exposed in the return values of methods on Blockchain
and SmartContract
, and not printed to console), defaults to true
on the Blockchain
instance.
'vm_logs'
prints the log of every instruction that was executed, 'vm_logs_full'
also includes code cell hashes, locations, and stack information for every instruction executed.
To override verbosity on a specific contract, use await blockchain.setVerbosityForAddress(targetAddress, verbosity)
, for example:
await blockchain.setVerbosityForAddress(targetAddress, {
blockchainLogs: true,
vmLogs: 'vm_logs',
})
After that, the target contract will be using debugLogs
from the Blockchain
instance to determine whether to print debug logs, but will always print VM logs and blockchain logs.
To set global verbosity, use the blockchain.verbosity
setter, for example:
blockchain.verbosity = {
blockchainLogs: true,
vmLogs: 'none',
debugLogs: false,
}
Note that unlike with setVerbosityForAddress
, with this setter you have to specify all the values from LogsVerbosity
.
If you want to test some behavior on a contract if it had specific code, data, and other state fields, but do not want to execute all the required transactions for that, you can directly set the full state of the contract as it is stored in sandbox by using this method on the Blockchain
instance:
async setShardAccount(address: Address, account: ShardAccount)
There are 2 helpers exported from sandbox that can help you create the ShardAccount
from the common properties: createEmptyShardAccount
and createShardAccount
.
Note that this is a low-level function and does not check any invariants, such as that the address passed as the argument matches the one that is present in the ShardAccount
, meaning it is possible to break stuff if you're not careful when using it.
It is possible to store the whole Blockchain
state in an object and restore this state later. This can be useful to compare the outcomes of different actions after a certain point, or to store the state of the contract system after a long series of configuration actions in order to quickly restore it for all required tests instead of setting it up each time.
To store the state, do the following:
const snapshot = blockchain.snapshot()
To restore the state, do the following:
await blockchain.loadFrom(snapshot)
Note: snapshots store the entire state of a Blockchain
instance, that includes:
- all contracts' states
- the network config
- next transaction lt
- the unix timestamp (if it is set)
- verbosity settings
- the libraries dictionary
- other internal parameters
Basically, the state of a Blockchain
instance after it is restored using a snapshot is the same as if the same actions were performed on that instance as on the instance from which the snapshot originates.
It is possible to use Sandbox to perform tests on contracts that are deployed to a real network. To do that, create your Blockchain
instance using a RemoteBlockchainStorage
, like so:
import { TonClient4 } from '@ton/ton'
import { Blockchain, RemoteBlockchainStorage, wrapTonClient4ForRemote } from '@ton/sandbox'
import { getHttpV4Endpoint } from '@orbs-network/ton-access'
const blockchain = await Blockchain.create({
storage: new RemoteBlockchainStorage(wrapTonClient4ForRemote(new TonClient4({
endpoint: await getHttpV4Endpoint({
network: 'mainnet'
})
})))
})
After that, whenever that Blockchain
instance tries to read the state of an unknown contract, that contract's state will be pulled from that network. RemoteBlockchainStorage
also accepts an optional second argument in its constructor, blockSeqno
, and if it is passed, the contracts' states will be pulled from that block number, instead of from the latest known block.
Note: only the states of unknown (do not confuse unknown with uninitialized) contracts will be pulled from the network - that is, if a contract's state has been previously set by any means (creation of a treasury, set manually, or was already pulled before), then it will not be re-read.
In cases where you need to process a few transactions from the transaction chain, but not all of them (for example, a contract generates 1000 transactions but you only need to check the first 10 - in that case, waiting for the whole 1000 transactions to be executed is wasteful), you may do so by using the sendMessageIter
method:
const iter = await blockchain.sendMessageIter(testMessage)
for await (const tx of iter) {
// some kind of processing for tx, for example:
console.log(tx)
}
This approach allows you to stop the processing of the transaction chain, unlike the usual approaches.
By default, this package will use its stored network configuration to emulate messages. However, you can set any configuration you want when creating the Blockchain
instance by passing the configuration cell in the optional params
argument in the config
field.
Special thanks to @dungeon-master-666 for their C++ code of the emulator.
Special thanks to @TrueCarry for their help with performance and other suggestions.
This package is released under the MIT License.
TON - EQAQR1d1Q4NaE5EefwUMdrr1QvXg-8mDB0XI2-fwDBD0nYxC