You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The item at a[4] (Inf) is not drawn. That's great. However, the item at a[2] (NaN) is drawn - but at x=1. When plotting any NaN value a[i]=NaN, this will be plotted as (x,y) = (i-1,i), which is weird.
Of course this is not a major problem - let's concentrate on fixing the code that's producing NaN! - but it is an oddity to be aware of I think. Perhaps this is well known behaviour in gnuplot, though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is inconsistent behaviour when plotting NaN values vs Inf values:
This produces the following:
The item at
a[4]
(Inf) is not drawn. That's great. However, the item ata[2]
(NaN) is drawn - but atx=1
. When plotting anyNaN
valuea[i]=NaN
, this will be plotted as(x,y) = (i-1,i)
, which is weird.Of course this is not a major problem - let's concentrate on fixing the code that's producing NaN! - but it is an oddity to be aware of I think. Perhaps this is well known behaviour in gnuplot, though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: