Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Pull Requests to docs #8376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

itaigilo
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #8293.

Change Description

Adding Pull Requests to the docs (in the "How To" section).

This blog post was used as a reference.

@itaigilo itaigilo added the docs Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 16, 2024
@itaigilo itaigilo requested review from ozkatz, talSofer, keren-lakeFS and a team November 16, 2024 23:55
@itaigilo itaigilo added the include-changelog PR description should be included in next release changelog label Nov 16, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2024

♻️ PR Preview fa1dc38 has been successfully destroyed since this PR has been closed.

🤖 By surge-preview

Copy link

E2E Test Results - DynamoDB Local - Local Block Adapter

13 passed

Copy link

E2E Test Results - Quickstart

11 passed

Copy link
Contributor

@talSofer talSofer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Looks good!

I'm blocking for adding an RBAC sections

- /reference/pull_requests.html
---

# Pull Requests
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add an RBAC section?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIK (maybe @N-o-Z will know better), this feature is currently available to all users.
Plus, if an admin will change the RBAC conf for PRfD, the tab (and "Create PR" button) will still show up for users, but yield errors when trying to act -
So maybe it's better to leave RBAC out of this doc until it's more mature?

Copy link
Member

@N-o-Z N-o-Z Nov 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The RBAC section (permissions) is under the RBAC page. We can link to it, but how is this different from any other feature that requires permissions?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some have it (e.g. morroring) but we're inconsistent. A valid point, we can go ahead without it because it is easy to understand from RBAC page.

Copy link
Member

@N-o-Z N-o-Z left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! 😃

@itaigilo itaigilo merged commit 09fdb98 into master Nov 18, 2024
41 of 43 checks passed
@itaigilo itaigilo deleted the feature/add-pull-requests-to-docs branch November 18, 2024 15:06
@idanovo idanovo added exclude-changelog PR description should not be included in next release changelog and removed include-changelog PR description should be included in next release changelog labels Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation exclude-changelog PR description should not be included in next release changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing documentation for Pull Requests
4 participants