Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port improvements to upstream 😃 #193

Open
goyalyashpal opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Port improvements to upstream 😃 #193

goyalyashpal opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@goyalyashpal
Copy link

Hi!
Thanks for adding features to muCommander and keeping those FOSS.

Now that the upstream project is maintained again at mucommander/mucommander, would u consider making pull requests up there?

Thanks again for improvements 😃


Unfortunately the muCommander project was abandoned by the autors and not supported since 2012. It lacks such basic and necessary features, such as searching for files. After several unsuccessful attempts to contact the authors, I decided to create the clone muCommander
- https://trolsoft.ru/en/soft/trolcommander

@goyalyashpal
Copy link
Author

hi @trol73

can u think about this?

even if not, then can u atleast compile a list of the features added in trolcommander compared to kucommander.

regardless of ur decision, thanks

@trol73
Copy link
Owner

trol73 commented May 6, 2023

Hi,
trolCommander is open source software and you can move any features from it.
I personally prefer to develop trolCommander because i use it. And I use it, In particular because the muCommander seems to me to be too slow to start.

@goyalyashpal
Copy link
Author

is open source software and you can move any features from it.

yes, i perfectly understand that it is open source. but moving features require knowing which features exist in first place 😃

so, if u can list down the feature additions in this one, then someone else can see if thats worth moving or not.

And I use it, In particular because the muCommander seems to me to be too slow to start.

did u try doublecmd ?

@trol73
Copy link
Owner

trol73 commented May 7, 2023

Unfortunately, I do not have a ready list of implemented features. But I tried to describe them here: https://trolsoft.ru/en/taxonomy/term/50

Yesterday I installed and looked at the mucommander and I liked it. Over the past years, it has become much better and the community is actively working on it.

I also watched Double Commander and I really liked the latest version too. I used to try to use it, but it was a very long time ago.
I see that this project is actively supported. At startup, it consumes about 100MB of memory, unlike the mucommander, which consumes 10 times more :) And doublecommander starts instantly, unlike the mucommander.
trolcommander initially consumed about 300 MB of memory on my computer. Now, on current versions of JVM, memory consumption has grown to several gigabytes, and this is terrible and unacceptable! :)

I think I'll try to use dcommander more actively. And, I hope, I will be able to fully migrate to it and participate in its development. :)

@goyalyashpal
Copy link
Author

yep, doublecommander is super phenomenal - it's just sooo awesome. i have always wanted something like that. i have never every used windows explorer ever since i started using it. it was an instant click for me.

I think I'll try to use dcommander more actively. And, I hope, I will be able to fully migrate to it and participate in its development. :)

that would be awesome :)
there were some small quality of life features from mucommander that doublecmd can use :)

like this one: doublecmd/doublecmd#846

@goyalyashpal
Copy link
Author

goyalyashpal commented May 7, 2023

u might miss the inbuilt terminal though - i think

but u should try to use it anyway :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants