This benchmarking task is run by Github actions on ubuntu-latest. This document may be updated if a new version is released.
For each function like hash32, hash64 and hash128, there would be some sub-tasks to compare the performances between mmr3 and mmh3. There are 5 rounds for each sub-task with different string sizes and number of runs:
- XS - string length 1, run 1M times;
- S - string length 10, run 1M times;
- M - string length 100, run 100K times;
- L - string length 1k, run 100K times;
- XL - string length 10k, run 100K times.
and the result of each round and the average result are both recorded.
The benchmark score would be displayed as a markdown table similar to below:
| Item | XS | S | M | L | XL | Average | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hash32 | 2.0x | 2.0x | 1.7x | 0.8x | 0.5x | 1.4x | Y |
| Hash128 | 4.8x | 6.2x | 7.4x | 6.4x | 7.3x | 6.4x | Y |
Item - The task to compare the performances. Faster - The benchmark result.
Take the 2nd line for example, it means by running the task Hash128, the mmr3's speed is 6.4 times of mmh3 on average.
Info:
Date: 2022-08-21 09:47:07
System OS: Linux
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8171M CPU @ 2.60GHz
Python version: 3.10.6
mmr3 version: 1.3.0
mmh3 version: 3.0.0
Result:
| Item | XS | S | M | L | XL | Average | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hash32 | 1.9x | 1.8x | 1.8x | 1.3x | 1.0x | 1.6x | Y |
| Hash128 | 1.9x | 1.9x | 1.8x | 1.5x | 1.0x | 1.6x | Y |
2 of 2 tasks are faster!