Base62 is actually Base61

[johnaoss]

The character set provided in the spec:

0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy

Only contains 61 characters, and is thus a base61 encoding. Looking at the implementations listed on the document, it seems that most of them (if not all) include a z to the character set as I would expect.

Is this the intended behaviour? Or should the character set not include the character z?

[tuupola]

You are correct. Seems to be copy paste error. The z is missing. It should be 0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz.

[tuupola]

Thanks for the heads up!