We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When typesetting Cyrillic and Latin using MonomakhUnicode font, latin glyphs look too wide, comparing to the surrounding Cyrillic text.
To equalize style I had to artificially shrink the font by factor 0.87 to make Latin text look more consistent with the Cyrillic one.
I believe we should change the font to make Latin and Cyrilic widths visually compatible.
Example: x.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The font metrics should be the same as in the original Monomakh. Can you confirm that the text looks the same in Monomakh and in Monomakh Unicode?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Original Monomachus font has exactly the same problem - latin glyphs too wide.
So then this is a design issue rather than a bug. We would have to redesign the Latin characters.
I put wontfix because it's too much work, but if someone would like to work on it, great.
No branches or pull requests
When typesetting Cyrillic and Latin using MonomakhUnicode font, latin glyphs look too wide, comparing to the surrounding Cyrillic text.
To equalize style I had to artificially shrink the font by factor 0.87 to make Latin text look
more consistent with the Cyrillic one.
I believe we should change the font to make Latin and Cyrilic widths visually compatible.
Example:
x.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: