Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix validity check for IJK+ coordinates #271

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 12, 2019
Merged

Conversation

saprykin
Copy link
Contributor

@saprykin saprykin commented Aug 8, 2019

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 8, 2019

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@isaacbrodsky
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for catching this! Would you mind adding a test case to demonstrate this is fixed?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 8, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 607640e on saprykin:master into 576096c on uber:master.

@saprykin
Copy link
Contributor Author

saprykin commented Aug 9, 2019

I added additional test cases when j and k components of IJK coordinates are out of range. With previous version new tests are not failing though they must. Hopefully I added it to right place.

Copy link
Collaborator

@isaacbrodsky isaacbrodsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I applied this branch locally and confirmed that line 293 does get covered now.

@nrabinowitz nrabinowitz merged commit b6210f7 into uber:master Aug 12, 2019
isaacbrodsky pushed a commit to isaacbrodsky/h3 that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2019
@isaacbrodsky isaacbrodsky mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2019
mrdvt92 pushed a commit to mrdvt92/h3 that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2022
Fix validity check for IJK+ coordinates
mrdvt92 pushed a commit to mrdvt92/h3 that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants