Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracker: New Universal Blue Installer #468

Closed
2 of 5 tasks
noelmiller opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed
2 of 5 tasks

Tracker: New Universal Blue Installer #468

noelmiller opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
iso Issues relating to ISO images

Comments

@noelmiller
Copy link
Member

noelmiller commented Jan 7, 2024

Spec Document

https://hackmd.io/sNczIQz-SKau6oKUS6187Q?view

Purpose

The current install method is either using the current ISO which is unreliable due to connectivity requirements or rebasing from the stock Silverblue project. This makes it difficult for new users of the project to try Universal Blue or current users to have a simpler method of installation.

Proposed Solution

Utilize upstream: https://github.com/JasonN3/container-installer
Our Fork: https://github.com/ublue-os/isogenerator

We are no longer going to attempt to use https://github.com/osbuild/bootc-image-builder

We may revisit it in the future if it provides features for modifying the kickstart file that is deployed by default with it and Fedora Atomic Desktops ship with bootc by default.

Current Blockers for MVP

Nice to Haves

Discussion

Discussion Thread is being archived here: https://www.answeroverflow.com/m/1192504002252914791

@castrojo
Copy link
Member

castrojo commented Jan 7, 2024

Current isogenerator: https://github.com/ublue-os/isogenerator

I don't think we'd need a new action we'd just adapt this one? Unless we want to have a standalone osbuild action that would be useful to the osbuild project, because if we're going to do it it'd be awesome for everyone who uses osbuild after us can reuse a generic action.

@EyeCantCU
Copy link
Member

I think having a generic osbuild action is the way to go

@castrojo
Copy link
Member

castrojo commented Jan 8, 2024

We should make sure we don't forget ucore into AWS right off the bat. We know that osbuild will get backends for other clouds so it's a nobrainer.

I know the tech difference is just a different flag but we need to think about aws accounts and all that stuff.

ucore/nvidia/zfs as an image would really, really attract attention from the kind of people we want helping us. 😄

@castrojo
Copy link
Member

I've closed most of the old iso tagged issues with instructions to the new installation page.

@noelmiller
Copy link
Member Author

All issues in this tracker issue are open on isogenerator repo. There is no reason to keep this tracker open. Closing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
iso Issues relating to ISO images
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants