-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compilation errors and warnings #89
Comments
Where did you get lilyglyphs from? Is it part if MikTeX, or did you get
I think this one is something you can't avoid when using the microtype |
I cloned it from here.
I don't recall this being an issue when I tried the package out a year ago (or however long ago it was).
I'm confused—isn't the whole point of this package so that you can use Emmentaler glyphs and the like in continuous text? |
Please comment out line 43 (?)
Yes, this is the point of the package. What I wanted to say is: Emmentaler as a font is not designed for this purpose. And obviously the |
Looks general. I get the same errors and warnings as before, only now they all say "emmentaler-16" instead of "emmentaler-26." |
Where exactly are the font files? And are you compiling with lualatex or xelatex? |
They're in
LuaLaTeX. |
Am 20.06.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Daniel Rosen:
Hm, this is a bit difficult for me, as I don't really know how LaTeX |
Define "completely new"? |
You wrote you're on a new computer, so I assumed you have a new LaTeX
installation on a new computer.
|
It was new in September or October, and I've used LaTeX on it once or twice since then, but not lilyglyphs. |
Hm, doesn't make it easier unfortunately ... Could you please compile a minimal example and post the complete log (or send it to me if it's too long)? For example \documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{lilyglyphs}
\begin{document}
\lilyDynamics{f}
\end{document} |
|
I think we can give that cache thing a try. Please post or send the content of |
No such file exists. However, I tried compiling the example you posted again to see if the
The only difference in the other was that the This is pretty baffling to me, since I didn't change anything that I can recall... Do you want me to post the log file again? |
Bump. |
Sorry for the delay, I was really busy with a few other things. Please try compiling the minimal example with xelatex. If that works then please try running
after reading http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/232921/updating-your-own-font. |
The file doesn't compile at all with
If you want the full log file, I'll email it to you. |
I've just tried to use the package for the first time since getting my new computer. When I try to compile
lilyglyphs/documentation/lilyglyphs-example.tex
using LuaLaTeX, I get a bunch of errors and warnings,even though the PDF appears to compile correctly. One error is repeated about 25 times in reference to (it appears) every usage of a package-specific command, e.g. for line 68:Some of the glyphs in the lines referenced still compile correctly, while others don't show up at all.
I also get 7 warnings, all of them variants of
the only differences being in the two numbers in the font location (the one in parentheses, which is sequential from 0 to 6, and the one after the last slash, which is 10.95, 9, or 12).
I've already copied the
fonts
directory to my local texmf tree. How can I make this compile error- and warning-free?System specs: Windows 8 Professional SP1 x64, MikTeX 2.9
![file-page1](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5809600/8166287/cf1e3eca-1364-11e5-8e22-e93af3d1569b.png)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: