Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
32 lines (23 loc) · 2.65 KB

PartioningVsSharding.md

File metadata and controls

32 lines (23 loc) · 2.65 KB

Partitioning Vs Sharding

Both sharding and partitioning are techniques used to manage large databases, but they differ in how they distribute the data:

Sharding

  • Distribution: Sharding splits the data horizontally across multiple servers or nodes. Each shard is a complete and independent subset of the data, containing its own copy of the table schema.
  • Scalability: Sharding excels at horizontal scaling. As your data grows, you can simply add more servers to distribute the load.
  • Complexity: Sharding introduces complexity in managing a distributed system. You need to handle routing queries to the appropriate shard and ensure data consistency across all shards.
  • Example: Imagine a social media platform with sharded user data. Users from North America might be stored on one shard, while users from Europe reside on another.

Partitioning

  • Distribution: Partitioning divides a single table horizontally within the same database server. Partitions are essentially sub-tables that hold specific subsets of the data based on a chosen criteria.
  • Performance: Partitioning improves query performance by allowing you to quickly locate relevant data. Queries can target specific partitions, reducing the amount of data scanned.
  • Management: Partitioning is easier to manage compared to sharding as everything remains within a single server.
  • Example: An e-commerce website might partition its order table by year. Queries for past orders can then be directed to the appropriate year partition.

Here's a table summarizing the key differences:

Feature Sharding Partitioning
Distribution Across multiple servers Within a single server
Scalability Excellent horizontal scaling Limited by server capacity
Complexity More complex (distributed system management) Simpler management
Performance Improved due to parallel processing Improved for focused queries
Consistency Maintaining consistency across shards can be challenging Consistency is generally straightforward

In conclusion:

  • Use sharding for massive datasets requiring horizontal scalability and potentially high write volume.
  • Use partitioning for improved query performance on large tables within a single server, especially when queries target specific subsets of data.