Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add validation if SC tunnel is active and add delay on start of test execution #5017

Closed
NatalliaSamarava opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5119
Closed
Labels
feature New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@NatalliaSamarava
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently we have a random failes in Saucelabs tests. We are using Sauce connect , one and multithreading. The error in Saucelabs is "Misconfigured -- No active tunnel found for provided identifier".

Describe the solution you'd like
We had a call with engineer from Saucelabs and as solution to fix this error he provided to add an extra validation if Tunnel is active after the success message that we can start our test. Here is a information that he sent:
"We support multiple readiness checks. In the example I shared on the call I used the Tunnel REST API listed on this page:
https://docs.saucelabs.com/secure-connections/sauce-connect/setup-configuration/readiness-checks/
This is the actual demo: https://github.com/StuMinch/check_tunnel_status "

Describe alternatives you've considered
As an extra step it should be good to have an configurable property to set a delay start of test execution.

@NatalliaSamarava NatalliaSamarava added the feature New feature or request label May 3, 2024
@valfirst valfirst linked a pull request Jun 11, 2024 that will close this issue
@valfirst valfirst added this to the 0.6.11 milestone Jun 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants