Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: ditch noVNC for KASM? #333

Open
pumhood opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Enhancement: ditch noVNC for KASM? #333

pumhood opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@pumhood
Copy link

pumhood commented Jun 18, 2024

I was wondering is possibly ditching noVNC for KASM might resolve some of the issues the docker image is seeing. KASM is what the Linuxserver group uses instead of noVNC and to be honest, it is much nicer. They have a github repo for their kasm base image here if you are interested : https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-baseimage-kasmvnc

@vogler
Copy link
Owner

vogler commented Jun 23, 2024

Thanks, I'll have to try it out.

@vogler vogler changed the title Not an issue, just a suggestion/enhancement request - Ditch noVNC for KASM? Enhancement: ditch noVNC for KASM? Jun 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants