diff --git a/meetings/2022-03-24.md b/meetings/2022-03-24.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cb5c030 --- /dev/null +++ b/meetings/2022-03-24.md @@ -0,0 +1,266 @@ +# Minutes of did-pkh work item + +## 24 Mar 2022 + +Agenda: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/28 + +IRC: https://meet.w3c-ccg.org/archives/w3c-ccg-didpkh-2022-03-24-irc.log +Audio: https://meet.w3c-ccg.org/archives/w3c-ccg-didpkh-2022-03-24.ogg +Video: https://meet.w3c-ccg.org/archives/w3c-ccg-didpkh-2022-03-24.mp4 + +``` +did:pkh DID Method Task Force Transcript for 2022-03-23 + +Organizer: + Wayne Chang +Scribe: + Our Robot Overlords +Present: + Zach (Ceramic), Sergey Ukustov, TallTed // Ted Thibodeau (he/him) + (OpenLinkSw.com), Charles E. Lehner, Brian Richter + +Our Robot Overlords are scribing. +Charles E. Lehner: Recording is on. +Charles E. Lehner: This is the did pkh call and recording is on. +Charles E. Lehner: So I'm going to find the issue. +Charles E. Lehner: That I. +Charles E. Lehner: And for this for this call. +Charles E. Lehner: And share this in the chat. +Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/28 +Charles E. Lehner: Does anyone have an agenda items. +Charles E. Lehner: Currently we there's two open PRs and a bunch + of issues. +Charles E. Lehner: And I wanted to mention the couplet cctc a + recovery script oh sweet is there anything else we should talk + about. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay I guess we could start. +Charles E. Lehner: So the pull request there's two polar quests + the first one is number 23. +Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/pull/23 +Charles E. Lehner: I'm meeting a few several weeks ago that was + not really a. +Charles E. Lehner: Full meeting but one person. +Charles E. Lehner: Attended as well as me and we talked. +Charles E. Lehner: Is this something that where we'd be okay + with emerging as a as a transcript of a previous call or is + nobody comfortable with that today. +Brian Richter: Seems fine to me I hear them. + no objection + here +Charles E. Lehner: All right I'll put a note. +Charles E. Lehner: There are no objections. +Charles E. Lehner: I also realized we should probably have + introductions I recognize some people here did but does anybody + want to introduce themselves. +Brian Richter: Yeah sure yeah I'm Brian Richter company Aviary + Tech who's been hovering around the space for a while now and I + had been meaning to join these calls but didn't see it on my + calendar and can find it for a while but then I saw you and Juan + talking about it and there wasn't many people joining so I found + it in here. +Charles E. Lehner: Cool thanks Brian welcome did the auto scribe + describe your company's name correctly. +Charles E. Lehner: Or how is it spelled. +Zach_(Ceramic): And I can go as well yeah I'm Zach I'm with the + three-box Labs team working on ceramic and work on the client + libraries and some of the education stuff Join one of these is a + few weeks ago or maybe a few months now not too familiar the + process here but yeah we'll try to be here more often. +Charles E. Lehner: Cool thanks Zack welcome. +Charles E. Lehner: And I'm Charles Laney from Spruce sorry go + ahead. +Charles E. Lehner: And all Ted is everyone no tell Ted Ted you + want to introduce yourself. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Sure I can do + that I'm Ted Thibodeau, with OpenLink Software have been for 20 + plus years. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): I'm involved + with a whole bunch of identity related working groups and + Community groups on W3 and this is just one of them not high on + the crypto but many of the other pieces. +Charles E. Lehner: Call thanks Daddy. +Charles E. Lehner: And I'm Charles I work at Spruce and I'm in + the did working group The VC working group credentials community + group and implementing software at Spruce and working on this + work item at ccg. +Charles E. Lehner: So I guess we could proceed with PRS and + issues unless anybody has any any other ideas. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay so that was PR number 23 the next one + open is number 15. +Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/pull/15 +Charles E. Lehner: In no particular order this is ADD support + for a Leo. +Charles E. Lehner: And I think this is still waiting on iron + iron the The Capes process to approve this alien namespace. +Charles E. Lehner: Is there anything else to mention about this. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay I put. +Charles E. Lehner: Know in the comments about that. +Charles E. Lehner: So next we can we have issues and. +Charles E. Lehner: And we have this additional agenda item that + I added there's nine issues. +Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c/vc-wg-charter/pull/105 +Charles E. Lehner: I guess I'll just mention this this VC + working group Charter PR 105 that's was something I wanted to + share with this work item call because it's relevant for you did + pkh. +Charles E. Lehner: It's a signature sweet for Recovery ecdsa + recovery signature for a sec P 256 K 1 and this is useful for did + pkh we use it we specify to use it in the in the did pkh spec and + it's because you can create a signature. +Charles E. Lehner: Then recover the public key and then hash the + public key to verify that it corresponds to a blockchain account + ID. +Charles E. Lehner: To beat that the pkh did is using. +Charles E. Lehner: Does that make sense for our just anyone have + any questions about that. +Charles E. Lehner: I don't hear any questions or comments. +Charles E. Lehner: All right so that's that I guess then there's + issues. +Brian Richter: I guess I guess I do have a comment so I voiced + my Swan on the issue I'm just wondering with the if there's + anything else we could do to make sure it gets into the charter + or anything else we can help with anything. +Charles E. Lehner: Oh I don't know but I thank you Brian for + that comment. +Brian Richter: Certain important work thanks for getting the + yarn. +Charles E. Lehner: Hopefully it will be okay with the working + group. +Charles E. Lehner: So then as for the issues there's nine open + does anybody have any particular issue they'd want to discuss + first. +Charles E. Lehner: If not we can just go in the order that + they're listed. +Charles E. Lehner: Prioritize by labels and then stay list + first. +Charles E. Lehner: There's 13 minutes left for this scheduled + call do we feel this is a good use of the time or would we rather + have a different format or prefer to do this with. +Charles E. Lehner: The other the other work item people. +Zach_(Ceramic): Yeah I don't I don't have much contact some of + these I guess last time I was pinned on one issue that I never + followed up on so the phone is contact some I guess number 12 I'd + be interested or in general how to navigate this the otherwise I + will contact some other issues. +Charles E. Lehner: Anyone else have any other thoughts. +Brian Richter: Let's start with that one see. +Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/12 +Charles E. Lehner: Okay sounds good so there's issue number 12 + playing Json text Vac test vectors still needed as noted in + number seven which is the pr that added test Vector did documents + which were later updated so I guess the idea is that these are + json-ld test vectors. +Charles E. Lehner: And LD documents and their this issue is + called for Json did documents. +Charles E. Lehner: I've had trouble seeing a consensus among the + did working group about if the Json did document is supposed to + be the same as a json-ld dig document as far as Json or if it's + supposed to just have the @context omitted. +Charles E. Lehner: Does anybody have ideas about that. +Charles E. Lehner: It could be something that as a did method we + could take a stance on. +Brian Richter: I think personally I think committing the context + doesn't really add anything and it only subtract. +Charles E. Lehner: So if it's if it's only the same if it's only + the same exact object then maybe it's not necessary or maybe the + suspect could be updated to say that that they can be used either + way. +Charles E. Lehner: Are there any other ideas about this. +Charles E. Lehner: Jack do you think that it would be good to + have a different set of test factors that are playing Json or do + you think these could be use used as as Json even though they're + originally json-ld. +Zach_(Ceramic): Yeah I don't have enough context to say but this + is mostly asking about this issue still relevant led to comment + on it and if there's any one thing yet figure out of context on + it. +Zach_(Ceramic): Not at the moment. +Charles E. Lehner: Is there anything we could say in the issue + thread that would be relevant. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay I'll tell you that weird if it seems + when we don't have a decision about this or enough context today + to make any decision about it. +Charles E. Lehner: I'm writing a comment. +Charles E. Lehner: Also we do have the CG but here so if anyone + wants to Q Plus is so small call but that could be useful. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay I wrote a comment. +Charles E. Lehner: Shall we going to more issues. +Charles E. Lehner: Well I guess that's what we could do. +Charles E. Lehner: Next shoe is number 27 update registration + and did spec registries. +Charles E. Lehner: Just something that we're going to go honors. +Charles E. Lehner: I have opinions about it. +Brian Richter: I have a sort of unrelated question is there a + rendered version of the spec or is it just the markdown in the + GitHub. +Charles E. Lehner: It's just the markdown currently which is + rendered as that that file that there's no other web page + currently do we feel like this is sufficient or not. +Brian Richter: I think it's probably fine but I don't really + have any strong opinions. +Charles E. Lehner: I'm going back to the issues list. +Charles E. Lehner: Stillest first order. +Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/18 +Charles E. Lehner: We have numbers 18 Upstream wishlist item. +Charles E. Lehner: Public or objective verification method + specification. +Charles E. Lehner: I think we might need one on this call to + address this. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Looks like + adding a help wanted tag to this could also be good. +Charles E. Lehner: I guess as far as the verification method + used in did pkh the blockchain method is being suggested in this + issue blockchain 2021 under or he's account. +Charles E. Lehner: And this is also in the VC working group + Charter as one of the possible input documents so or no it's not + I'm sorry the pgp crypto Sweta is but the blockchain one is not + so. +Charles E. Lehner: Something relevant in the future. +Charles E. Lehner: But we can't do much with the right now I + think. +Charles E. Lehner: Well unless anyone has anything else about + that I think maybe it'd be good if we can talk about the + scheduling of this call. +Charles E. Lehner: Because one said that this time is not + working for dif. +Charles E. Lehner: And He suggests Tuesday or Wednesday but we + also have to check with Joel about that is anyone on this call + currently have requests or priorities for scheduling of this call + and the future. +Brian Richter: It would work I'm sorry well for me on Wednesdays + or Tuesdays. +Brian Richter: Yeah Wednesday might be better. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Tuesday's + pretty full for people involved in CG and did work it may be + worth starting to Doodle Poll for this. +Charles E. Lehner: What about after VC working group. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): On which day. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): It looks like + that could work at least for me I can't speak for others. +Charles E. Lehner: I have a conflict with. +Charles E. Lehner: With that if so if it's too complicated we + could we could try to do polling. +Charles E. Lehner: This would be a 12 or maybe 12 15 on + Wednesday Eastern Time. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay well that's it for this half hour. +Charles E. Lehner: Thanks everybody for for joining. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Charles all + suggest that you throw a message out to I don't know what the + appropriate list is for this But whichever listed is suggesting + the possibility of the Wednesday time and see what happens. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay good idea thanks Ted. +Charles E. Lehner: I'm any recording now. +Brian Richter: Maybe even the ccg mailing list for that. +Charles E. Lehner: Recording his sorry what's that. +TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): All right I'm + just saying next time. +Brian Richter: Maybe even the ccg mailing list for that and then + you might get more interest joining as well. +Charles E. Lehner: Yep I thought that's what Ted suggested was + he saying the VC working group mailing list. +Brian Richter: No no he just didn't clarify what that's for + that. +Charles E. Lehner: Okay well that sounds good okay thanks have a + good one. + thanks! +```