Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should FedCM spec have conformance requirements over IDPs #471

Open
npm1 opened this issue May 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Should FedCM spec have conformance requirements over IDPs #471

npm1 opened this issue May 20, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@npm1
Copy link
Collaborator

npm1 commented May 20, 2023

Currently, the IDP HTTP API section is non-normative. It could be feasible to define conformance requirements for IDPs and have that section refer to such requirements.

@kdenhartog
Copy link
Contributor

kdenhartog commented May 22, 2023

#314 and #315 might be worth bringing back into scope if these requirements do come into play. Originally these were declared out of scope because this was considered non-normative. However, I don't think that if this is done that #314 and #315 MUST be brought back into scope but just rather pointing out that they could. In any case, I think it would be useful to have conformance requirements added. That was a point of confusion for me very early on when reading this spec because it wasn't clear what changes would be required of IDPs (if any) to support this API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants