Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Idea: Build JavaScript libraries that work in the browser #32

Open
dbooth-boston opened this issue Dec 8, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

Idea: Build JavaScript libraries that work in the browser #32

dbooth-boston opened this issue Dec 8, 2018 · 7 comments
Labels
Category: big ideas For major ideas that span multiple issue categories higher-level Higher-level RDF should address this

Comments

@dbooth-boston
Copy link
Collaborator

"build JavaScript libraries and things that work in the browser"
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2018Dec/0009.html
@dbooth-boston dbooth-boston added Category: big ideas For major ideas that span multiple issue categories Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice and removed Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice labels Dec 8, 2018
@ktk
Copy link

ktk commented Mar 5, 2019

Beats me how Ruben proposed the issue but did not even link to his own work. That is work-in-progress for some years now by a W3C Community Group.

There are three specs defined in there, see here. There are implementations of these specs and various parsers and serializers. Also there are higher-level APIs built on top of this stack that simplify things again. We still have to make it clearer how to start working with that, contributions are obviously welcome. The GitHub repository of the group gives a good idea of what is available.

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Member

Beats me how Ruben proposed the issue but did not even link to his own work.

Was setting a agenda, not pushing one, but yes, that's what I was hinting at 🙂

RDF/JS is the basis for sure, and we should build developer experiences on top of that.

@ktk
Copy link

ktk commented Mar 5, 2019

@RubenVerborgh I see that but the result was that this was on a slide at the W3C graph conference and as an outsider one had the impression nothing exists yet

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Member

Ooh not good. Please talk to my colleague @rubensworks then!

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Member

Other initiatives:

@dbooth-boston
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ktk, that was my mistake in preparing my slides: I forgot to include a link to rdf.js. Sorry! :( I have added a link now, for the benefit of anyone downloading my slides later.

@ktk
Copy link

ktk commented Mar 5, 2019

@dbooth-boston great thanks

@dbooth-boston dbooth-boston added the higher-level Higher-level RDF should address this label Mar 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Category: big ideas For major ideas that span multiple issue categories higher-level Higher-level RDF should address this
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ktk @RubenVerborgh @dbooth-boston