-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 667
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[css-masking] initial value of mask-repeat and mask-position #599
Comments
Resolution was to change the spec to match the WebKit/Chrome behavior. |
Why is this issue on the csswg github and not the fxtf github with all the other masking-1 issues? |
I've created w3c/fxtf-drafts#111 for this now, so the spec. is finally changed according to the implementations.
I couldn't find the related minutes. If you find them, please post them in the issue mentioned above. Sebastian |
This issue seems to be fixed in w3c/fxtf-drafts@bdb4c31 Should we close it? |
Closed as the edits were made (in 2018!!) |
https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#the-mask-repeat
Name: mask-repeat
Initial: no-repeat
Initial value in blink/webkit: repeat
https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#propdef-mask-position
Name: mask-position
Initial: center
Initial value in blink/webkit: 0%
I filed issues onto WebKit Bugzilla & chromium bug tracker to ask them following spec. Apple has no action on it[1]. Google changed mask-repeat initial value to no-repeat and reverted because of a regression on twitter[2].
Gecko turn on image-mask on nightly/ aurora channel(engineer version). Following the spec, we received several regression reports as well[3].
So, we either need to persuade all browser vendors changing their initial value by what spec defined(and fix all regression on each web site), or we probably should change the spec.
Any thought?
[1] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159866
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=628968
[3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1308963
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: