Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] #87

Closed
jpullmann opened this issue Jan 18, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] #87

jpullmann opened this issue Jan 18, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
dcat due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days requirement void

Comments

@jpullmann
Copy link

Related vocabularies comparision [RVC]

Analyse and compare similar concepts defined by vocabularies related to DCAT (e.g. VOID, Data Cube dataset).


Related use cases: Cross-vocabulary relationships [ID36] 
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

As there has been no further discussion on this issue, I propose to close it.

@andrea-perego andrea-perego added the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label Oct 29, 2020
@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this issue because the joint use with other vocabularies is already mentioned in the DCAT 2 Rec. DCAT Recommendation works under the Open Assumption, prescribing specific mapping on other vocabularies might depend on the use cases, a deeper comparison among vocabularies seems not core at this stage of work. (See resolution https://www.w3.org/2021/02/03-dxwgdcat-minutes.html#r03)

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, @riccardoAlbertoni .

Closing.

@andrea-perego andrea-perego removed the future-work issue deferred to the next standardization round label Mar 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dcat due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days requirement void
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants