diff --git a/index.bs b/index.bs
index ad5b8884..fc449f78 100644
--- a/index.bs
+++ b/index.bs
@@ -1281,11 +1281,21 @@ Recording and Reporting Formal Objections
* the members of the [=Advisory Board=]
* the members of the [=Technical Architecture Group=]
- A recusal is required for any of these
- directly involved in the matter of the [=Formal Objection=]
- (e.g. that they are a chair, and it is their decision that is in question,
- or they are the individual who registered the [=Formal Objection=]);
- other members may recuse themselves if they feel there could be a reasonable perception that they are directly involved.
+ Participants in the [=W3C Council=] must [=recuse=] themselves
+ if they are the person who issued the decision being objected to,
+ or if they are the person who registered the [=Formal Objection=].
+ Participants may also [=recuse=] themselves for any reason.
+ Any person who has recused themself
+ does not take part in its deliberations,
+ determination of concensus,
+ or votes
+ on this matter.
+ The [=W3C Council=] may still solicit and hear their testimony,
+ as they can of anyone else in the W3C community.
+
+ Issue: It is still an open question whether someone who has recused themself
+ should still be allowed to participate in the deliberations of the Council
+ even if they are excluded from the consensus/vote.
The CEO appoints the Chair of the W3C Council,
with the advice of the rest of the Council.
@@ -1293,18 +1303,6 @@ Recording and Reporting Formal Objections
unless the CEO [=recuses=],
in which case they must find an alternative chair.
- Issue(w3c/w3process#278): Fuzzy criteria for recusal are problematic:
- individual with only tangential involvement in the matter,
- or even with no real involvement at all in the matter,
- could be pressured into recursing themselves.
- Conversely, over-assertive individuals may fail to [=recuse=] themselves even when it would be appropriate.
- We may instead want to make a strict and non ambiguous criteria.
- It is also unclear how useful it is to require recusal from the person raising the objection,
- since that can easily be circumvented by asking someone else to file the objection on one's behalf.
- For example, recusal could be required of (and only of):
- a Chair who issued the [=Chair Decision=] or [=Group Decision=] being objected to,
- and the CEO for objections against their own decisions and those of the Team.
-
Having reviewed the information gathered by the [=Team=] and its recommendation,
and after sufficient sufficient deliberation,
the [=W3C Council=] decides whether to