diff --git a/index.bs b/index.bs index 263b74e..d5d6ee6 100644 --- a/index.bs +++ b/index.bs @@ -10,22 +10,18 @@ Editor: Rick Waldron 50572, Invited Expert, formerly on behalf of Bocoup and Former Editor: Mikhail Pozdnyakov 78325, Intel Corporation, https://intel.com/ Former Editor: Alexander Shalamov 78335, Intel Corporation, https://intel.com/ Former Editor: Tobie Langel 60809, Codespeaks, formerly on behalf of Intel Corporation, https://www.codespeaks.com/, tobie@codespeaks.com -!Test Facilitator: Wanming Lin (Intel Corporation) Abstract: This specification defines a framework for exposing sensor data to the Open Web Platform in a consistent way. It does so by defining a blueprint for writing specifications of concrete sensors along with an abstract Sensor interface that can be extended to accommodate different sensor types. -Issue Tracking: Generic Sensor API Issues Repository https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues !Other: Test suite, latest version history, previous version history Indent: 2 Repository: w3c/sensors Markup Shorthands: markdown on -Boilerplate: omit issues-index, omit conformance, omit feedback-header, repository-issue-tracking no Include MDN Panels: if possible Implementation Report: https://www.w3.org/wiki/DAS/Implementations -Ignored Vars: activated_sensors Inline GitHub Issues: yes Default Biblio Status: current Status Text: @@ -2264,60 +2260,6 @@ and Michael[tm] Smith for their editorial input. -
Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of - descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words "MUST", - "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", - "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in the normative parts of this - document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. - However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase - letters in this specification. - -
All of the text of this specification is normative except sections - explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [[!RFC2119]]
- -Examples in this specification are introduced with the words "for example"
- or are set apart from the normative text with class="example"
,
- like this:
-
-
This is an example of an informative example.
-Because this document doesn't itself define APIs for specific [=sensor types=]-- - that is the role of extensions to this specification-- - all examples are inevitably (wishful) fabrications. - Although all of the [=device sensor|sensors=] used a examples - would be great candidates for building atop the Generic Sensor API, - their inclusion in this document does not imply that the relevant Working Groups - are planning to do so. - -
Informative notes begin with the word "Note" and are set apart from the
- normative text with class="note"
, like this:
-
-
Note, this is an informative note.
- -Requirements phrased in the imperative as part of algorithms (such as - "strip any leading space characters" or "return false") - are to be interpreted with the meaning of the key word ("must", - "should", "may", etc) used in introducing the algorithm.
- -Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps can be - implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent. In - particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to - be easy to understand and are not intended to be performant. Implementers - are encouraged to optimize.
- -A conformant user agent must implement all the requirements - listed in this specification that are applicable to user agents.
-