Errata link should be optional; can be inline

[svgeesus]

Pubrules requires an errata link for Recommendations:

Errata - URI to an errata document for any errors or issues reported since publication. See also suggestions on errata page structure in the Manual of Style. Note: Do not put the errata document in TR space as the expectation is that we will not modify document in TR space after publication; see the policy for in-place modification of W3C Technical Reports.

However, we now have the option of Recommendation with Candidate/Proposed Corrections, which are effectively inline Errata.

@frivoal suggested to me that it should be possible to use alternate wording:

Yeah, that’s annoying. Do you think you could file a bug against pubrules, to get them to accept a sentence like ”<a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#errata">errata will be tracked inline in this document” as an alternative to the link?

[jennyliang220]

Hi @plehegar , is it ok for Pubrules to add the errata description?
cc @deniak

[deniak]

We actually have a way to distinguish regular RECs to RECs with Candidate/Proposed changes. I think it makes sense to make the errata optional for the latter.

[plehegar]

This makes sense to me.