We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
建议增加笔和x轴正方向的夹角度数,方便和power一起判定力度。直接计算 (bi1.high-bi1.low)/bi1.count bi1.count表示bi1这笔包含的k线根数
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
+1
Sorry, something went wrong.
这个角度计算方法的原理是什么?怎么理解啊
和缠论视角不一样,我的思路有一点点不同,当作缠论外的辅助参考。 公式类似abs(bi.max_high-bi.min_low)/bi.min_low/count(*0.1----方便自己看数值的没特别意义)
我一般用在相同条件选股后的辅助排序上,作为优先的指标。 1。同级别,完成某一笔用的时间越少,表示双方合力越是一致 2。实现同样的增降幅价格,用的时间越少,表示双方合力越是一致
我还用在某些形态的选股上,如果这一笔越陡,从另一方面可以粗略看作这一笔所代表的已完成的某次级走势级别越低,如:离开中枢的一笔等。
No branches or pull requests
建议增加笔和x轴正方向的夹角度数,方便和power一起判定力度。直接计算 (bi1.high-bi1.low)/bi1.count
bi1.count表示bi1这笔包含的k线根数
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: