You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The tail-call Wasm proposal has recently been moved to Phase 4 with respect to the Wasm standardization and is fairly light weight, therefore implementing it won't be a lot of work and we can expect it to be stabilized very soon. Furthermore having tail-call support in wasmi will be an enabler for self-hosting wasmi once (or if) we actually make use of tail-call based instruction dispatch.
Generally we should keep up with supporting finished Wasm proposals as this allows us to keep the Wasm spec test suite up to date.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is about adding support for the
tail-call
Wasm proposal.The
tail-call
Wasm proposal has recently been moved to Phase 4 with respect to the Wasm standardization and is fairly light weight, therefore implementing it won't be a lot of work and we can expect it to be stabilized very soon. Furthermore havingtail-call
support inwasmi
will be an enabler for self-hostingwasmi
once (or if) we actually make use oftail-call
based instruction dispatch.Generally we should keep up with supporting finished Wasm proposals as this allows us to keep the Wasm spec test suite up to date.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: