Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for accessoryView on GenericBrickCell #132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2017
Merged

Conversation

rubencagnie
Copy link
Contributor

  • Added property on GenericBrickCell
  • Setting this property adds a view at the right of the genericContentView
  • Tests

Fixes #126

- Added property on GenericBrickCell
- Setting this property adds a view at the right of the genericContentView
- Tests

Fixes #126
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 28, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #132 into master will increase coverage by 0.38%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #132      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.86%   93.24%   +0.38%     
==========================================
  Files          38       38              
  Lines        3057     3096      +39     
==========================================
+ Hits         2839     2887      +48     
+ Misses        218      209       -9
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Source/Bricks/Generic/GenericBrick.swift 100% <100%> (+14.06%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e8d1d44...05d6432. Read the comment docs.

@jay18001
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good

@jay18001 jay18001 merged commit ceda174 into master May 30, 2017
@jay18001 jay18001 deleted the 126-accessory-view branch May 30, 2017 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants