You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are a lot of routes with the red-white circle. They all have a ref, and that's the tag that differentiates them. Right now, that ref is not showing on routes that are correctly tagged with the osmc:symbol. It's not easy to see which paths are which. What's the solution?
One solution was to contact you and see if it's possible to render the ref alongside the symbol. If that's not possible, I will have to resort to tagging the routes with the same osmc symbol, but with a black number over it. That is not entirely correct, because the route itself doesn't have marks with numbers on them, only circles. But it has numbers at the start of the route and at intersections, so it's not entirely false either. Now that I look at Europe, it seems this is the way to tag osmc:symbols.
What's your opinion?
Anyway, thanks for your project, it's very helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree, if there are both ref and osmc:symbol present (e.g. here), the ref should take precedence (or, even better, both should be shown - but that is likely more complex to implement)
Hi,
this is the place in question:
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14!45.9056!15.9838
There are a lot of routes with the red-white circle. They all have a ref, and that's the tag that differentiates them. Right now, that ref is not showing on routes that are correctly tagged with the osmc:symbol. It's not easy to see which paths are which. What's the solution?
One solution was to contact you and see if it's possible to render the ref alongside the symbol. If that's not possible, I will have to resort to tagging the routes with the same osmc symbol, but with a black number over it. That is not entirely correct, because the route itself doesn't have marks with numbers on them, only circles. But it has numbers at the start of the route and at intersections, so it's not entirely false either. Now that I look at Europe, it seems this is the way to tag osmc:symbols.
What's your opinion?
Anyway, thanks for your project, it's very helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: