Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/wos 590 luna differences step 2 update content #219

Conversation

paweljozwicki
Copy link
Member

The "Luna - low code" version was simplified and adjusted to look more like "Luna - custom code".
The "Luna - no code" was changed to use some new features from Kyanite components library.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) labeled with bug
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) labeled with enhancement
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code standards of this project.
  • My change requires updating the documentation. I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Visual tests status

Some visual changes require review.

Please download BackstopJS report and check if there is no visual regression.

Please note that the report only stay for 1 day!

Name Link
Commit 17ef726
Logs https://github.com/websight-io/starter/actions/runs/6958870575
Report visual-tests-report_2023-11-22T145658.zip

@paweljozwicki
Copy link
Member Author

Visual changes for "Luna - low code" and "Luna - no code" as expected

@paweljozwicki paweljozwicki merged commit eb07a03 into fix/WOS-590-luna-differences-step-1-split-applications Dec 29, 2023
6 checks passed
@paweljozwicki paweljozwicki deleted the fix/WOS-590-luna-differences-step-2-update-content branch December 29, 2023 10:04
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants