Do we allow reserved words/keywords in path components / module names?

[k2d222]

WGSL has a bunch of reserved words that could very well be module or folder names: common, external, impl, priv, public, std, type, wgsl to name a few. I would be quite sad if we couldn't make a package named std.

WGSL also has a buch of reserved keywords. For example, Lygia has a WGSL module named const.

Should module names follow the same restrictions as declaration idents?

I don't see any serious downside to this, I vote for.

[k2d222]

Only the else keyword leads to a LR(1) conflict: if () {} else can be either if() {} else {} or if() {} else::path::to::fn();. Other keywords are fine.

[stefnotch]

I would follow the ident rules for consistency. Aka disallow everything that is reserved.