Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upcoming HTML standard issue triage meeting on 4/20/2023 #9132

Closed
past opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Upcoming HTML standard issue triage meeting on 4/20/2023 #9132

past opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
agenda+ To be discussed at a triage meeting

Comments

@past
Copy link

past commented Apr 6, 2023

Today we held our biweekly triage call (#9070) and I will post the meeting notes there in a bit. The next one is scheduled for April 20, 1 am PDT. Note that this is 2 weeks later in an APAC+Europe friendly time.

People interested in attending the next call please respond here or reach out privately to me or the spec editors. We will be tagging issues for the next call again using the agenda+ label in all WHATWG repos and we would like to invite anyone that can contribute to said issues to join us.

@past past added the agenda+ To be discussed at a triage meeting label Apr 6, 2023
@keithamus
Copy link
Contributor

I’m interested

@past
Copy link
Author

past commented Apr 7, 2023

Happy to add you Keith, I will need your email address to do that. Either email me (pastith at GMail) or let another participant know, if you have interacted with them before.

@past
Copy link
Author

past commented Apr 20, 2023

Thank you all for attending today! Here are the notes from this meeting (the next one is at #9193):

Agenda

Attendees: @emilio, @fergald, @domenic, @smaug----, @zcorpan, @petervanderbeken

  1. Review past action items
    1. Someone from WebKit should comment on Tests for directionality and shadow DOM.
      1. Still no review from WebKit, but it looks like Brian Kardell is working on this with Fantasai.
    2. Domenic to look into anchor element interactions for Modernized version of window.open() API. Olli to look more into the issue and comment.
      1. Carry over Domenic's action item
      2. There's a comment about returning a promise, people should think about that; it's an interesting idea!
        1. Olli says: "would be great", but the big question is when to resolve the promise. Do you get access to the initial about:blank?
        2. What's the earliest point at which resolving would be useful?
    3. For Clarify the sequential focusing behaviour when the current focused element is not in the sequential navigation order Joey will explain why Chrome behaves this way. Domenic will clarify his reading of the spec.
      1. Done and done.
  2. Carryovers from last time
    1. [Anne] Accessibility Attribute Request
      1. Anne not present; carrying over
    2. [Domenic] Resetting forms on document reactivation
      1. It turns out this was discussed on a previous call. In general, there are no obvious solutions here, and tradeoffs everywhere. We can remove this from the agenda but welcome anyone who wants to push for a concrete proposal.
  3. New topics
    1. [Emilio] popover light dismiss behavior is not specified for Esc key
      1. Discussion of Domenic's CloseWatcher proposal as a solution.
      2. Emilio would prefer to specify keydown instead of leaving it up to the UA.
      3. Emilio will help advise how to make the CloseWatcher spec more rigorous, and Domenic will work on upstreaming it to HTML.
    2. [Anne] HTML cross-document encoding inheritance with bogus Content-Type charset
      1. Carry over, none of the relevant people are on the call.
    3. [Fergal] BroadcastChannel + bfcache proposal
      1. Gecko and Chromium are on board but there's no WebKit person on the call... We can try carrying over.

Action Items

  1. @domenic to look into anchor element interactions for Modernized version of window.open() API
  2. @emilio will help advise how to make the CloseWatcher spec more rigorous, and @domenic will work on upstreaming it to HTML.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
agenda+ To be discussed at a triage meeting
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants