You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To go forward in the direction of being better integratable with jest we might consider writing a runner similar to the one used in pyjest.
As far as I can see we could get the same UI and behavior as normal jest tests. This would also enable us to do optimizations in the future like spawning multiple devices to parallelize test execution.
I think the effort of building a first "MVP" and maintaining it are not that high, so I thought it might be an idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For me there would need to be a nice out of the box solution for setting the configurations / using multiple configurations and maybe also parallelism, but maybe I should be more clear and move this into another issue. What do you think?
To go forward in the direction of being better integratable with jest we might consider writing a runner similar to the one used in pyjest.
As far as I can see we could get the same UI and behavior as normal jest tests. This would also enable us to do optimizations in the future like spawning multiple devices to parallelize test execution.
I think the effort of building a first "MVP" and maintaining it are not that high, so I thought it might be an idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: