关于域名解析策略:AsIs、IPIfNonMatch、IPOnDemand该如何选择 #2012
hululu1068
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
保持软件作者默认选项 你想搞明白原理,要学v2ray/xray 配置文件原理和查看作者生成的配置文件,自己看写法。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
xray和v2ray的wiki对域名解析策略的解释略有不同
xray推荐用AsIs
https://xtls.github.io/document/level-1/routing-lv1-part2.html#_8-%E6%98%8E%E4%BF%AE%E6%A0%88%E9%81%93%E3%80%81%E6%9A%97%E6%B8%A1%E9%99%88%E4%BB%93
Qv2ray推荐用IPIfNonMatch
https://qv2ray.net/lang/zh/manual/route.html
Passwall @xiaorouji 大佬默认配置用的是IPOnDemand
自己测试下来,IPOnDemand速度是最快的,网页几乎的秒开,但是有些网页会无法加载;
IPIfNonMatch也比较快,也是有些网页、元素无法加载;
AsIs相对慢些,但是不会有网页加载不出来的情况,用就了也比较快,内存缓存比较多(我的选择)
你们都用的什么策略啊?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions