Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Easier distinguishable selected unit #12597

Open
2 tasks done
Kzer-Za opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

Feature request: Easier distinguishable selected unit #12597

Kzer-Za opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@Kzer-Za
Copy link

Kzer-Za commented Dec 7, 2024

Before creating

  • This is NOT a gameplay feature from Civ VI, BNW, or outside - see Roadmap
  • This is NOT a gameplay feature from Vanilla Civ V or from G&K - If so, it should be a comment in Missing features from Civ V - G&K #4697

Problem Description

Currently it is nearly impossible to tell which unit is selected, at least for me. I mean the visual cue for it is very hard to notice. To make it easier I have currently set "Unit icon opacity" to 40% but it still is very hard. (I have found 40% to be the optimal balance between still seeing the icons of non-active units and seeing some difference between an active (selected) and other units).

Of course, it is not completely impossible to tell which unit is selected, but its very hard, while it should be very easy.

Related Issue Links

No response

Desired Solution

Make the selected unit blink: like a cursor in a text editor or the selected unit in Master of Magic (1994).

Alternative Approaches

Make the selected unit have a brightly-colored semitransparent background that is overlaid over its tile.

Additional Context

No response

@Kzer-Za Kzer-Za added the feature label Dec 7, 2024
@asphyx0r
Copy link

asphyx0r commented Dec 7, 2024

I agree, I have the same problem here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants