RqMultiPart.Fake fails on more then one part

[jhyle]

Please see yegor256/netbout#979. The TkAttachTest::takeAttachementNameFromField constructs a RqMultiPart.Fake request with two form-data parts. It fails with the exception

org.takes.HttpException: [400] header "Content-Disposition" is mandatory
    at org.takes.rq.RqHeaders$Smart.single(RqHeaders.java:206)
    at org.takes.rq.RqMultipart$Base.asMap(RqMultipart.java:313)
    at org.takes.rq.RqMultipart$Base.buildRequests(RqMultipart.java:224)
    at org.takes.rq.RqMultipart$Base.<init>(RqMultipart.java:140)
    at org.takes.rq.RqMultipart$Fake.<init>(RqMultipart.java:413)
    at com.netbout.rest.bout.TkAttachTest.takettachementNameFromField(TkAttachTest.java:214)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
    at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
    at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.pc.Scheduler$1.run(Scheduler.java:318)
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

As Content-Disposition is given for both parts I suspect that RqMultiPart.Fake does not handle this correctly.

[davvd]

@yegor256 please do something about this issue

[dmzaytsev]

@yegor256 please do something about this issue

[krzyk]

@yegor256 could you validate if this is a real bug?

[yegor256]

@jhyle can you please post a unit test here, to reproduce the bug?

[yegor256]

@jhyle is it still a problem or I can close the ticket?

[paulodamaso]

@0crat in

[0crat]

Job #577 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

@0crat in (here)

@paulodamaso Job #577 is already in scope

[0crat]

Thanks for your contribution, @jhyle/z! If you would be a member of the project, you would now earn +15 reputation points, as explained in §29. You can join and apply to it, see §2.

[0crat]

The job #577 assigned to @robsonataide/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

@robsonataide/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

[0crat]

The user @robsonataide/z resigned from #577, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: It is older than 10 days, see §8

[0crat]

Resigned on delay, see §8: -30 point(s) just awarded to @robsonataide/z

[0crat]

The job #577 assigned to @Serranya/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[0pdd]

@jhyle the puzzle #950 is still not solved.

[Serranya]

@jhyle I added an Test that repduces the issue in #947. Actually fixing the issue is tracked in #950. Please close this issue so that only #950 is open.

[Serranya]

@0crat wait for an answer from @jhyle

[0crat]

@0crat wait for an answer from @jhyle (here)

@Serranya The impediment for #577 was registered successfully by @Serranya/z

[Serranya]

@paulodamaso Hi, @jhyle did not answer in the last 8 days. Can you please close the issue?

[paulodamaso]

@Serranya Thanks!

[0crat]

@ypshenychka/z please review this job completed by @Serranya/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[0crat]

The job #577 is now out of scope

[ypshenychka]

@0crat quality good

[0crat]

@0crat quality good (here)

@ypshenychka The project doesn't have enough funds, can't make a payment

[0crat]

Order was finished, quality is "good": +35 point(s) just awarded to @Serranya/z

[0crat]

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z

[0pdd]

@jhyle the puzzle #1095 is still not solved; solved: #950.