Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is the reproduction accuracy not as good as in the paper? #3

Open
unira-zwj opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 10 comments
Open

Why is the reproduction accuracy not as good as in the paper? #3

unira-zwj opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 10 comments

Comments

@unira-zwj
Copy link

Why is the reproduction accuracy not as good as in the paper?

@yjh0410
Copy link
Owner

yjh0410 commented Oct 19, 2022

@ElonZhou99 Not as good as in the paper? From the results reported in this project, my YOWO is better than the official YOWO. I am a little confused about your question. Can you tell me more about it?

@unira-zwj
Copy link
Author

@ElonZhou99 Not as good as in the paper? From the results reported in this project, my YOWO is better than the official YOWO. I am a little confused about your question. Can you tell me more about it?

I'm apologize that i got a mistake.

@unira-zwj
Copy link
Author

@yjh041 The new question: Do the train epoch setting(epoch = 4) enough? In my training, the first epoch got mAP66%.

@yjh0410
Copy link
Owner

yjh0410 commented Oct 20, 2022

@ElonZhou99 That's OK.

On the UCF101-24, I train YOWO and YOWO-Nano with only 5 epochs, so I think epoch=4 is enough.

@unira-zwj
Copy link
Author

@ElonZhou99 That's OK.

On the UCF101-24, I train YOWO and YOWO-Nano with only 5 epochs, so I think epoch=4 is enough.

Thank you.

@yjh0410
Copy link
Owner

yjh0410 commented Oct 20, 2022

@ElonZhou99 Hi ! Dear friend, I train my YOWO on UCF101-24 with 1 epoch, and then I evaluate it on UCF101-24. The mAP results are follows.

AP: 75.67% (1)
AP: 97.96% (10)
AP: 81.94% (11)
AP: 63.31% (12)
AP: 71.84% (13)
AP: 94.22% (14)
AP: 87.91% (15)
AP: 82.89% (16)
AP: 81.01% (17)
AP: 84.03% (18)
AP: 94.29% (19)
AP: 45.15% (2)
AP: 87.88% (20)
AP: 70.56% (21)
AP: 80.81% (22)
AP: 68.45% (23)
AP: 86.82% (24)
AP: 84.21% (3)
AP: 70.23% (4)
AP: 46.04% (5)
AP: 95.36% (6)
AP: 92.70% (7)
AP: 87.73% (8)
AP: 92.77% (9)
mAP: 80.16%

As you can see, the mAP is 80.16%, so I am a little confused about your 66% mAP. I wonder whether you might have any trouble training YOWO.

@unira-zwj
Copy link
Author

@yjh0410 wow,just 1 epoch can get so high mAP! In my test, I changed the 2D backbone and I did not load any pre-train weight for 2D and 3D backbone. Maybe this is the reason that i got a lower mAP.

@unira-zwj
Copy link
Author

@yjh0410 And could you test the epoch 1 mAP without any pre-train weight of the backbone?
Thank you!

@yjh0410
Copy link
Owner

yjh0410 commented Oct 21, 2022

@ElonZhou99 I agree with you. No pretrained weight of 2D or 3D backbones might be the major reason. I recommend you load the pretrained weight of the 3D backbone since the 3D CNN is hard to be trained well.

@unira-zwj
Copy link
Author

@ElonZhou99 I agree with you. No pretrained weight of 2D or 3D backbones might be the major reason. I recommend you load the pretrained weight of the 3D backbone since the 3D CNN is hard to be trained well.

Ok, thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants