-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
low align rate conflicting with bismark align rate #81
Comments
What was the command you used to run bismark? Can you take a quick look at the base composition of read1 and read2 fastq (you can use fastqc too)? Do the reads in read1 fastq have mostly A, T and G? Knowing these would be helpful for troubleshooting. |
In you case, this data has the opposite pattern that bismark and methylpy expect from the data from the directional library. For methylpy we will need to use the |
Thanks for your sophisticated suggestions! After adding the |
Hello, we encountered some problems when using methylpy to align the data of SRR6911777. The result showed that we only had an align rate which is less than 1%, while we obtained an align rate about 35% by aligning with bismark. Results of other samples were consistent with SRR6911777. This is really confusing and we hope you can give us some suggestions. Our code for methylpy is as follows:
methylpy paired-end-pipeline \ --read1-files $Read1 \ --read2-files $Read2 \ --sample $sampleid \ --forward-ref ${ref_methylpy_mm10}/mm10.genome_f \ --reverse-ref ${ref_methylpy_mm10}/mm10.genome_r \ --ref-fasta ${ref_methylpy_mm10}/mm10.genome.fa \ --path-to-output ${outdir}/methypy_${species} \ --num-procs $threads \ --path-to-picard $picard \ --path-to-samtools $samtools \ --path-to-cutadapt $cutadapt \ --remove-chr-prefix False \ --keep-temp-files True \ --trim-reads True
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: