-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 1524/text with bullets #1534
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bdd0361
remove unnecessary empty string to fix error
rebecarubio 79fc184
update slate and slate-react dependencies
rebecarubio 2963d75
update value property in Slate component due to upgrade of dependency
rebecarubio cf74232
remove focus border
rebecarubio ef611bb
sort alphabetically the properties
rebecarubio 7085145
add yarn.lock file for upgrade dependencies
rebecarubio 49c64fd
add helper function to check if node should be removed
rebecarubio f298169
sort imports alphabetically
rebecarubio 758ccff
use object.prototype to access property
rebecarubio 06f49d8
update deleteBackwards function in editor to fix missing bullet point…
rebecarubio d06fcd3
trim instructions to avoid white spaces
rebecarubio 3f84b0d
avoid unnecessary render of Slate
rebecarubio File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems unnecessarily complex to me. I realize you probably found this solution in the Slate issue tracker, but I'm curious if you know the reason for using
hasOwnProperty.call(node[0]…
instead ofnode[0]?.hasOwnProperty(…
, etc?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the reason I was implemented so complex it's because
Ancestor
and the following types are a mixed of types. The reason to usehasOwnProperty.call
it's to avoid a lint error. If I usenode[0]?.hasOwnProperty(…,
I get the errorDo not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object
.