You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm confuced about the last layers of the feature map with stride 2 and kernel size =3,and I also visualize the network with the infer_shape showed as below,How can 1X1 feature map can convolve with stride 2 and kernel size =3 ? And also the output shape is also wierd.
Hi,
yes, I use 512, in the last two extra layers is in the same scale(1X1 feature map)
I think 1X1 feature map can convolve with stride 2 and kernel size =3 just padding 0's around feature map. However, if the scale of the feature map is the same, the anchor's map to the original image will also be the same(or similiar due to the different size,same ratio in your symbol_factory.py).
I also visualize data shape 608 ,and it is more reasonable that the feature map size is different(2X2 and 1X1)
Hi,
I'm confuced about the last layers of the feature map with stride 2 and kernel size =3,and I also visualize the network with the infer_shape showed as below,How can 1X1 feature map can convolve with stride 2 and kernel size =3 ? And also the output shape is also wierd.
Thanks!!
elif network == 'mobilenet':
from_layers = ['conv_12_relu', 'conv_14_relu', '', '', '', '', '']
num_filters = [-1, -1, 512, 256, 256, 256, 256]
strides = [-1, -1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2]
pads = [-1, -1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
sizes = get_scales(min_scale=0.15, max_scale=0.9, num_layers=len(from_layers))
ratios = [[1,2,.5], [1,2,.5,3,1./3], [1,2,.5,3,1./3], [1,2,.5,3,1./3],
[1,2,.5,3,1./3], [1,2,.5], [1,2,.5]]
normalizations = -1
steps = []
return locals()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: