You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe the prov output from rdtLite is a mixture of their own terms on top of plain PROV-O, so it would be nice to indicate that the document conformsTo both specs.
On the CWL side we can either use the cwl.output.json to add the extra annotation, or perhaps add another field to the relevant section in outputs. But we'll need to make sure that this "inner" provenance is connected with the specific CommandLineTool execution, not the whole workflow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the rdtLite (R script) provenance @simleo suggests
I believe the prov output from rdtLite is a mixture of their own terms on top of plain PROV-O, so it would be nice to indicate that the document
conformsTo
both specs.On the CWL side we can either use the
cwl.output.json
to add the extra annotation, or perhaps add another field to the relevant section inoutputs
. But we'll need to make sure that this "inner" provenance is connected with the specificCommandLineTool
execution, not the whole workflow.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: