Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to the v3.0 version of the Computer Vision analyze endpoint #255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2020

Conversation

dkotter
Copy link
Collaborator

@dkotter dkotter commented Oct 28, 2020

Description of the Change

We recently updated from the v1.0 Computer Vision analyze endpoint to the v3.1 version. After further testing, I'm noticing less accurate image captions (which we store as alt text) are being returned, resulting in either lowering the confidence score fairly low (like ~30%) or you end up with no alt text ever being saved.

It seems the v3.0 endpoint is much more accurate, with most captions being in the >75% range. This results in more accurate alt text and more images that have alt text generated.

Alternate Designs

None

Benefits

More accurate image scanning results

Possible Drawbacks

None

Verification Process

I scanned multiple images with the v3.1 endpoint and then again with the v3.0 endpoint. Results across the board were much better with the v3.0 one.

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my change.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@dkotter dkotter self-assigned this Oct 28, 2020
@helen helen added this to the 1.6.0 milestone Oct 28, 2020
@helen helen merged commit 9efa256 into develop Oct 28, 2020
@helen helen deleted the fix/computer-vision-v3.0 branch October 28, 2020 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants