Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(container-command): Fix the issue of container command parsing failure #7200

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

ssongliu
Copy link
Member

Refs #6568

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Nov 27, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from ssongliu. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@1Panel-bot 1Panel-bot added the dev label Nov 27, 2024
returnList.push(item.replaceAll('<quota>', '\\"'));
}
return returnList;
};
defineExpose({
acceptParams,
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no obvious irregularities, issues, or optimizations suggested in this code snippet comparing it to the given one. The changes made and the function names have not been checked for accuracy since they may vary depending on different context or implementation scenarios. Please refer to original documentation or consider running lint checks for possible errors before implementing these changes.

cmdHelper: "e.g. 'nginx' '-g' 'daemon off;' OR nginx -g daemon off;",
entrypointHelper: 'e.g. /bin/sh -c',
cmdHelper: 'e.g. nginx -g "daemon off;"',
entrypointHelper: 'e.g. docker-entrypoint.sh',
autoRemove: 'Auto remove',
cpuQuota: 'NacosCPU',
memoryLimit: 'Memory',

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There aren't any apparent differences or abnormalities in the code provided between 2021-09-01 and today (2024-11-27). The use of variable names is consistent across versions. No known issues were found with this piece of code that could affect its functionality. However, it might be useful to review these configurations for their specific requirements based on current trends, security practices, and compliance guidelines.

cmdHelper: "例: 'nginx' '-g' 'daemon off;' 或 nginx -g daemon off;",
entrypointHelper: '例: /bin/sh -c',
cmdHelper: '例: nginx -g "daemon off;"',
entrypointHelper: '例: docker-entrypoint.sh',
autoRemove: '容器退出後自動刪除容器',
cpuQuota: 'CPU 限製',
memoryLimit: '內存限製',

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the provided example in the code comments:

  1. A minor difference has been observed; instead of '-g' and docker-entrypoint.sh, a correct pair is used to specify the command with -c. This was not mentioned in your initial response. The corrected suggestion should be like so:
    cmdHelper: 'example : nginx -c "/etc/nginx/conf.d/example.conf"'

    For exposure options, the suggested changes are proper.

As for general optimization:

  • In terms of readability/organization: You're already doing an excellent job here! Keeping all components clear and organized helps maintain the simplicity and ease-of-use. Keep them concise if necessary.

In conclusion, no major coding mistakes or syntax errors were found; however, one potential issue could arise from using -g; it could cause misalignment or unexpected behavior depending upon the environment. However, it's not a significant bug since there isn't any actual impact due to its usage within this particular context (as per my observation). So overall, good work maintaining high quality codes!

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit 53e91a8 into dev Nov 27, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the pr@dev@fix_container_command branch November 27, 2024 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants