Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(appstore): Handle Requests After Application Installation #7206

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

global.LOG.Errorf("App Store synchronization failed %v", err)
}
}()

setting, err := settingService.GetSettingInfo()
if err != nil {
return err

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code contains some syntax errors such as missing braces {}, semicolons (;), and extra characters after strings like empty string " ". The content is not in consistent format with indentation levels of [] which suggests it was written in bash scripting.

For optimizing the code readability, we can use multi-line strings to avoid using unnecessary spaces around {, ,, } etc.,. For example,

func (a AppService) PageApp(req request.AppSearch) (interface{}, error) {
  appDTOs := []*response.AppDto{}
  for _, ap := range apps {
   // Use a map instead of an interface{} if you need accessability 
    appDTO, _ := response.GetAppDto(ap)
    
    appDTOs = append(appDTOs, appDTO)
  }
}

In this case though I suggest looking into better documentation formats rather than manually improving existing ones, they usually contain meaningful information that developers can refer to easily. Please note these recommendations are specific to text-based coding advice and may not apply directly to other contexts or technologies.

Note: If there's still something unclear please let know

return
}
_, _, _ = httpUtil.HandleGet(downloadCallBackUrl, http.MethodGet, constant.TimeOut5s)
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There does not appear to be any irregularities, issues, or significant optimizations necessary for this piece of code. It appears to perform its intended function smoothly without any errors. However, if you have specific aspects that need attention (like performance improvements, bug fixes), please specify them so I can suggest some actions accordingly.

global.LOG.Errorf("http request failed(handleNode), err: %v", err)
return
}
RequestDownloadCallBack(nodeDetail.DownloadCallBackUrl)
}()
go startRuntime(runtime)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The given code seems to be a mix of several different files (some with ".go" suffix indicating they're part of an application) that are being used together but might not be directly connected via dependencies. Some parts appear to be missing or incomplete.

For the specific sections you've asked to check, here's what we can infer:

  1. The import statements suggest a package related to Docker handling (docker, files) which could include methods like pulling images from remote registries; however, without direct context on this functionality it may be unclear if there is intended usage or implementation.

  2. There seems to be a function named startRuntime inside another struct containing some logic unrelated to starting and managing runtime instances in terms of containers/distributions etc.; again, additional information would help determine where this fits into the current structure.

  3. Additionally, some comments seem outdated because github.com no longer exists (referring to "github.com").

Based on these observations, I recommend checking more details about other modules mentioned elsewhere within the same repository as well as looking at each section individually to ensure all necessary imports and functions are present, ensuring a consistent flow and structure throughout your codebase while also reviewing its general purpose and use cases.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Nov 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot merged commit 3e96e83 into dev Nov 28, 2024
6 checks passed
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot deleted the pr@dev@website branch November 28, 2024 10:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants