pref: Adjust node editing logic #7217
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
zhengkunwang223
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| font-size: 16px; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code has a few differences that you can optimize for better performance and readability:
Differences:
- The
md-editorwas updated to utilize the latest version, which should be checked against the current versions of MD editor before using it. - The code is not properly formatted and could benefit from more meaningful variable names.
Optimization Suggestions:
Since this seems like personal work, I cannot run tests directly as an AI. However, here's some general advice:
- Format Code: Use semicolons instead of spaces around each statement.
- Use meaningful variables: Instead of referring to
<el-drawer>with its full name (<el-drawer>) every time, refer to it simply as'...'<elm.drawer>'. - Consistent Naming: Ensure consistency across all parts of the application naming conventions throughout your project.
- Function Names/Symbolic References: Instead of relying on long functions such as
changeOption, consider creating smaller, more specific functions and symbols if necessary. - Documentation: Make sure there is documentation explaining what each block does.
Please review these optimizations and see how they impact the overall functionality of your component. If necessary, you might also need to refactor methods into their own functions to improve their clarity and maintainability.
Remember, improving readability and maintaining consistent standards are crucial steps towards making your codebase cleaner and easier to understand for both yourself and others who will read and use the code in the future.
| search(); | ||
| }); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { | ||
| isProductPro.value = globalStore.isProductPro; | ||
| search(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no syntax errors or inconsistencies here. You should continue optimizing this template to ensure it's clear and concise without using unnecessary features. Here's a suggested improvement:
<!-- Importing styles directly -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="path/to/md-editor-v3/lib/style.css">
<Upgrade></Upgrade>
<div id="system-update-container">
<!-- Other components... -->
</div>This way, you avoid adding the MD editor CSS in each component file which could potentially lead to additional bundling.
For more improvements:
- Split long strings into smaller chunks when displaying them in templates.
- Use dynamic imports rather than importing files inline at runtime.
- Implement consistent spacing and indentation for improved readability.
Feel free to ask about specific optimizations based on these general principles. For example: "Would you suggest I use camelCase over camelCaps naming for property names?"
| return func(g *gorm.DB) *gorm.DB { | ||
| return g.Order(orderStr) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (c *CommonRepo) WithOrderRuleBy(orderBy, order string) DBOption { | ||
| func (c *CommonRepo) WithOrderRuleBy(orderBy, order string) global.DBOption { | ||
| switch order { | ||
| case constant.OrderDesc: | ||
| order = "desc" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code is incomplete and contains some errors. Here are my observations:
There seems to be an inconsistent usage of global.DBOption in multiple places, which needs to be fixed.
As for specific issues or optimizations, it's important to review each implementation based on real-world requirements.
However, based solely on the provided comments, I can make general notes that could help improve efficiency:
- The
goroutinesyntax should not used due to its deprecated nature. - There isn't enough context available about how you're using goroutines inside this code snippet, but if used appropriately, they may introduce significant overheads in certain scenarios.
- Consider using Gorm functions more effectively instead of creating custom ones. For example, use
wherewith SQL queries directly rather than manually building them using where clauses from database objects.
If there was supposed to be further information here such as additional interfaces, structures, method signatures or examples of data types, let me know!
|
No description provided.