Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Workflow execution logic #1913

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

refactor: Workflow execution logic

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 26, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit efa73c8 into main Dec 26, 2024
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@refactor_workflow_logic branch December 26, 2024 07:29
self.status = 200

def is_end(self):
return self.status == 200
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code seems generally robust and well-structured. However, here are some minor suggestions for improvement:

  1. Docstring Consistency: The class methods could benefit from adding docstrings to explain their purpose and usage.

  2. Type Hinting: It's a good practice to include type hints for better readability and maintainability.

  3. Error Handling: Ensure that error handling is implemented in appropriate places, especially when dealing with chunk_list or other data structures.

  4. Code Comments: Add comments where needed to clarify complex logic or flow control.

  5. Variable Naming: Use descriptive variable names instead of single-character abbreviations like view_type.

Here's an updated version of the code incorporating these suggestions:

from typing import List

class NodeChunk:
    """
    Represents a chunk of content associated with a node.
    
    Attributes:
    - status (int): Current state of the node chunk processing.
      Status 0 indicates initialization,
      Status 200 indicates processing completion.
    - chunk_list (List[Object]): List of chunks comprising the node.
    """

    def __init__(self):
        self.status = 0
        """Status of the node chunk processing."""
        self.chunk_list: List[object] = []
        """List of chunks making up the node."""

    def add_chunk(self, chunk: object):
        """
        Adds a new chunk to the list of chunks.
        
        Parameters:
        - chunk (Object): New chunk to be added.
        """
        if isinstance(chunk, object) and not chunk:
            raise ValueError("Chunk must be non-empty.")
        self.chunk_list.append(chunk)

    def end(self, chunk: object = None):
        """
        Marks the node chunk processing as complete.
        
        Parameters:
        - chunk (Object | None): Optional final chunk to be processed.
          If None, only marks the processing as complete.
        """
        if chunk is not None:
            self.add_chunk(chunk)
        self.status = 200

    def is_end(self) -> bool:
        """
        Checks if the node chunk processing has completed.
        
        Returns:
        - bool: True if processing is complete, False otherwise.
        """
        return self.status == 200


class TreeNode:
    """
    Represents a tree structure node in the system.
    
    Attributes:
    - content (str): Content stored in the node.
    - view_type (str): Type of view rendered for this node.
    - runtime_node_id (str): Unique identifier for each run-time node.
    - chat_record_id (str): ID related to the conversation record.
    - child_node (NodeChunk): Child node containing additional details.
    """

    def __init__(self, content: str, view_type: str, runtime_node_id: str, chat_record_id: str, child_node: NodeChunk):
        """
        Initializes a Tree Node instance.
        
        Parameters:
        - content (str): Node's content.
        - view_type (str): View type of the node.
        - runtime_node_id (str): Runtime-specific unique ID.
        - chat_record_id (str): Conversation-related ID.
        - child_node (NodeChunk): Additional information about the node.
        """
        self.content = content
        """Content of the node."""
        self.view_type = view_type
        """Type of view for the node."""
        self.runtime_node_id = runtime_node_id
        """Unique ID for the runtime node."""
        self.chat_record_id = chat_record_id
        """Conversation-related identification."""
        self.child_node: NodeChunk = child_node
        """Details about child nodes."""

    def to_dict(self):
        """
        Converts current state of the node into a dictionary representation.
        
        Returns:
        - dict: Dictionary representing the node attributes.
        """
        return {
            "view_type": self.view_type,
            "content": self.content,
            "runtime_node_id": self.runtime_node_id,
            "chat_record_id": self.chat_record_id,
            "child_node": self.child_node.to_dict() if self.child_node else {}
        }

This revised code includes:

  • Docstrings for both classes to improve understanding of what each class and method does.
  • Added type hints for parameters and variables to indicate expected input types and return types.
  • A comment above the constructor of TreeNode explaining its functionality.
  • A placeholder method for error handling within add_chunk.
  • An example implementation of an additional method to_dict() for easy conversion of objects to dictionaries.

"POOL_OPTIONS": {
"POOL_SIZE": 20,
"MAX_OVERFLOW": 5
}
}

def __init__(self, *args):
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code looks generally correct and should work as intended. However, I can offer a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Pool Size Configuration: The POOL_SIZE is set to 20 by default, which is a reasonable number if you expect to have multiple concurrent database connections. You might want to adjust this based on your specific application's needs.

  2. Maximum Overflow: Setting MAX_OVERFLOW at 5 means that up to 5 connection attempts will be made before raising an exception. This is good practice but ensure it doesn't lead to too many unhandled errors if there's frequent load imbalance.

  3. Documentation and Readability: While not strictly necessary, adding docstrings to classes and methods (like the one for __init__) could help make the code more readable for other developers working with this configuration system.

  4. Error Handling in get_db_setting: Ensure that the method properly handles cases where some required keys might be missing from the configuration dictionary. For example:

    def get_db_setting(self) -> dict:
        db_settings = {
            "NAME": "default",
            "HOST": os.getenv("DB_HOST", ""),
            "PORT": self.get('DB_PORT', None),
            "USER": self.get('DB_USER', ""),
            "PASSWORD": self.get('DB_PASSWORD', ""),
            "ENGINE": self.get('DB_ENGINE', "")
        }
        
        # Additional settings...
        return db_settings

This approach allows for flexible defaults that don't break the function when certain environment variables are not defined.

Overall, the code is well-structured and follows best practices, so these minor changes won't affect its functionality significantly.

@@ -214,6 +215,7 @@ def get_flow_params_serializer_class(self) -> Type[serializers.Serializer]:

def get_write_error_context(self, e):
self.status = 500
self.answer_text = str(e)
self.err_message = str(e)
self.context['run_time'] = time.time() - self.context['start_time']

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code snippet you provided seems to be part of a Django REST framework view that handles API requests and flow execution in an application. Here are some points for review:

Irregularities:

  1. Namespace Confusion: The uuid.NAMESPACE_DNS.bytes might cause confusion since it's not clear without context what this constant represents. If you need help with understanding or using namespaces, let me know!
  2. UUID Generation: The use of sha1 on multiple nodes and UUIDs can lead to collision risks unless handled properly.

Potential Issues:

  1. Null Check: Ensure that up_node_id_list and node are always populated before accessing them.
  2. Performance Consideration: Generate the runtime_node_id only once per request rather than inside the loop.

Optimization Suggestions:

  1. DRF Serializer Setup: Ensure that the serializer class returned by get_flow_params_serializer_class() correctly implements all required fields and validations.
  2. Error Handling: Instead of catching general exceptions (Exception), catch more specific exception types like ValidationError (if applicable).

Here is your suggested improvement in terms of handling these points:

from rest_framework import serializers
from rest_framework.exceptions import ValidationError, ErrorDetail
import uuid

# Assuming NodeChunk is defined elsewhere
from application.flow.common import Answer, NodeChunk
from application.models import ChatRecord
from application.models.api_key_model import ApplicationPublicAccessClient
from common.constants.authentication_type import AuthenticationType
import hashlib

class MyView(APIView):
    def __init__(self, node, workflow_params, workflow_manage, up_node_id_list=None):
        super().__init__()
        if not up_node_id_list:
            up_node_id_list = []
        
        # Initialize node chunk outside the loop
        self.node_chunk = NodeChunk()

        # Create runtime_node_id using a consistent method
        self.runtime_node_id = hashlib.sha1(
            b''.join([
                uuid.NAMESPACE_DNS.bytes,
                bytes(str(uuid.uuid5(uuid.NAMESPACE_DNS,
                                      u"".join(sorted(list(up_node_id_list))) + str(node.id)))).encode('utf-8')
            ]
        ).hexdigest()

    def get_flow_params_serializer_class(self) -> Type[serializers.Serializer]:
        return YourFlowParamsSerializer  # Replace with actual serializer class name

    def post(self, request, format=None):
        try:
            # Handle incoming data or other logic here
            pass
        except Exception as e:  # Catch specific exceptions if necessary
            self.set_exception_response(e, request)

    def set_exception_response(self, e, request):
        self.status = 500
        self.answer_text = str(e)
        self.err_message = str(e)
        self.context['run_time'] = time.time() - self.context.get('start_time', 0)  # Safe access with default value

# Example usage of the improved setup

This updated version ensures proper initialization of attributes outside loops, better performance by creating the runtime_node_id only once, and includes a method for setting error responses explicitly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant